Report: Battlefield 1 will have nine multiplayer maps

Datamining from the alpha revealed the names.

49

The dataminers are at it again, and apparently, they have unearthed the names of the Battlefield 1 multiplayer maps.

A post on the Battlefield reddit leaked the first list of names and images, but a post further down offered a compete list with some overview shots as well:

An earlier leak on reddit outed images showing menus and UI.

Again, as of now, there is no official confirmation, but everyone loves some good conversation and speculation, right?

The open beta ends today, and we have some impressions from it. The game will come out on October 21 for PS4, Xbox One and PC 

Contributing Editor
From The Chatty
  • reply
    September 8, 2016 9:35 AM

    John Keefer posted a new article, Report: Battlefield 1 will have nine multiplayer maps

    • reply
      September 8, 2016 10:30 AM

      Nice, that seems alright. Hopefully they all feel pretty good, DICE should know how to make a good map.

      • reply
        September 8, 2016 6:40 PM

        yeah I guess they do have a tiny bit of experience with that.

    • reply
      September 8, 2016 11:06 AM

      [deleted]

      • reply
        September 8, 2016 11:56 AM

        :-( the more the better I guess, but... nine seems a reasonable amount?

        • reply
          September 8, 2016 12:13 PM

          nine is fine

        • reply
          September 8, 2016 12:39 PM

          Nah should release 20 of'em, doesn't matter that 13 of them will suck and never get played.

          • reply
            September 8, 2016 1:01 PM

            [deleted]

            • reply
              September 8, 2016 1:03 PM

              How long has that been clear? What makes you say that?

              • reply
                September 8, 2016 1:08 PM

                [deleted]

                • reply
                  September 8, 2016 1:18 PM

                  [deleted]

                • reply
                  September 8, 2016 1:21 PM

                  It is the pre-order of expansions that bothers you? They have been doing the expansions since BF 1942 and granted they added maps for free in patches later for that game, but it didn't make it obvious that they were trying to boost DLC sales as you say.

                  BF2 they released 2 free maps after the DLC released. BC2 had pretty weak maps up front as each map was not playable on all gametypes initially. More were added and tweaked for gamemodes throughout the life. That one did just have a small amount of DLC though.

                  • reply
                    September 8, 2016 1:44 PM

                    [deleted]

                    • reply
                      September 8, 2016 1:49 PM

                      Probably because no one played the DLC much before that. Even then, consider that the barely popular if even noticed Euro Forces pack for BF2 still had more people playing it than the most popular BF2 mod ever did.

                      Were you really desperate for more content in BF4 than what there was at launch? I certainly wasn't sick of those maps by the time the DLC was released. Then they delayed the rest of the DLC to fix up the core game because of the issues people had with it especially on console.

                      I really don't think it is a matter of withholding content so much as putting out DLC that was desirable and enjoyable. BF2142's expansion pack was really fun, but a bit of a side show.

                      • reply
                        September 8, 2016 2:03 PM

                        [deleted]

                        • reply
                          September 8, 2016 2:05 PM

                          Following Call of Duty's model? You mean yearly releases? They did that before COD. They did persistent leveling, unlocks, and paid map packs before COD too.

                          • reply
                            September 8, 2016 2:08 PM

                            [deleted]

                            • reply
                              September 8, 2016 2:13 PM

                              LA Noire was the first Season Pass game and that was in 2011. If you are talking about pre-selling DLC I guess. I don't remember if you could pre-order Special Forces for BF2. COD didn’t start doing that until after MW2 anyway...on PC that is.

                              BF3 doing that was actually a better deal than the straight map packs with the Season Pass /Premium thing.

                              Which of course isn't all that different than an MMO subscription either. All of them are essentially justifying continuing to pay the developers who are still working on the game after release.

                              • reply
                                September 8, 2016 2:33 PM

                                [deleted]

                                • reply
                                  September 8, 2016 2:38 PM

                                  So you are mostly just happy that they didn’t announce it or allow people to pre-order it until a month after release?

                                  Battlefield 2's first expansion pack, Special Forces, first began its development sometime during or shortly before the release of the original Battlefield 2 by DICE: Battlefield producer, Mike Doran, commented in August 2005 that "The truth is that work on Battlefield 2: Special Forces began several months ago."[24] It was officially announced on July 14, 2005 and released on November 21 of the same year.[25][26]


                                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battlefield_2#Battlefield_2:_Special_Forces

                                  • reply
                                    September 8, 2016 2:49 PM

                                    [deleted]

                                    • reply
                                      September 8, 2016 3:45 PM

                                      Other than pure number of conquest maps, it is hard for me to believe that BF1 will not have more content than BF2 at launch.

                    • reply
                      September 8, 2016 2:02 PM

                      I don't think we should compare it to BF1942. We are in a new era of gaming where you have to pay for map packs and the player base just gets fragmented with each release. Not to mention there were no stupid unlocks so you can actually balance the game/classes more easily.

                    • reply
                      September 8, 2016 7:19 PM

                      I still only played like 5 maps on BF42. Some of the other maps had BS for balance. All the water maps were basically the same.

    • reply
      September 8, 2016 11:34 AM

      Any bets on which ends up being the One Shit Map core to all Battlefield releases post-BC2?

      My money is on Amiens.

      • reply
        September 8, 2016 11:41 AM

        Are you referring to the meat grinder map or the giant no one wants to play it other than vehicle obsessives map?

        • reply
          September 8, 2016 12:05 PM

          The one that includes absolutely fuckwitted design decisions that even children who design maps on graph paper during recess could tell you are not conducive to good gameplay.

          Its Operation Metro, basically.

          • reply
            September 8, 2016 12:08 PM

            They can still do metro. The Paris metro opened in 1900

          • reply
            September 8, 2016 12:13 PM

            Grinder then. Yeah, those go back before BC2. Karkand was BF2's. I never played 1942 outside of LANs, but I think Stalingrad or Berlin (can't remember) was the meat grinder for it.

            • reply
              September 8, 2016 12:28 PM

              BF2 had a lot of shitty maps that seemed way too big. I'll take a meat grinder like stalingrad over any map that requires motorized transport to get to a different flag in a reasonable amount of time. Those maps always become musical chair shit shows sorta like the map in the BF1 beta.

              • reply
                September 8, 2016 12:31 PM

                I agree. Personally I liked the BF3 approach to the large vehicle maps where there was a small group of 3-4 flags close together on the inside for infantry to fight over. I think they tried to do this with that beta map, but missed the simple elegance of something like Firestorm.

                I would also really like to see a return to some maps designed ground up for Rush.

      • reply
        September 8, 2016 11:58 AM

        [deleted]

      • reply
        September 8, 2016 2:23 PM

        The trench warfare map everyone keeps begging for

    • reply
      September 8, 2016 11:57 AM

      [deleted]

    • reply
      September 8, 2016 11:59 AM

      9 sounds low... What did the other games have at launch?

    • reply
      September 8, 2016 12:09 PM

      At this point with EA/Dice it feels like you're getting half a game unless you pony up the $50 for the season pass.

      • reply
        September 8, 2016 12:19 PM

        At this point? The bonus map stuff goes back to 1942. Even if we admit that 1942 had more maps on release, it still added more in its expansions. BF2 had fewer on release and added considerably more in expansion packs that added up to the $40 or 50 you currently pay for a pack anyway.

        Never mind that the current BF's have more gametypes, weapons, player leveling systems, friend/social enhancements, etc., it also has a single player campaign. Plus, it is also only $10 more than your spent on BF1942 at release despite inflation.

        Personally I am not stoked by BF1, but I don’t think value arguments hold much water.

    • reply
      September 8, 2016 12:32 PM

      Is the beta over? I can't connect to anything via matchmaking, and nothing comes up in the server list either. PS4. I thought today was the last day.. wtf

      • reply
        September 8, 2016 1:49 PM

        Yeah, looks like it's over. Shame too, since I didn't get to put any time in yesterday I'd been hoping to play a bit more today. Oh well.

    • reply
      September 8, 2016 2:10 PM

      [deleted]

      • reply
        September 8, 2016 2:13 PM

        It's just you. That semi auto rifle is ridiculous at mid range

      • reply
        September 8, 2016 2:16 PM

        [deleted]

        • reply
          September 8, 2016 2:21 PM

          [deleted]

        • reply
          September 8, 2016 2:32 PM

          Was there even a revive icon working? We tried it out on an empty server because we didn't think it was working and we never saw an icon when down and asking for a medic. Gave up on the medic class after that.

          • reply
            September 8, 2016 2:36 PM

            [deleted]

          • reply
            September 8, 2016 6:58 PM

            Yes it worked. There are always several white dots in 3D that were out there representing people needing reviving. Just takes some getting used to.

      • reply
        September 8, 2016 2:21 PM

        Medic revive was pretty useless in BF4.

      • reply
        September 8, 2016 3:15 PM

        [deleted]

      • reply
        September 8, 2016 6:07 PM

        I thought the medic had the best gun honestly. But in terms of their other main support ability (namely reviving people), yeah, that did seem entirely pointless. In all the time I spent as a medic, I only encountered one dude who wanted to be revived. And even then, I didn't realize I'd need to manually switch to the syringe, and by the time I'd done that and was attempting to revive the guy, someone else ran up and shot me. :-P

      • reply
        September 8, 2016 7:27 PM

        Medic rifle was super fun! I do agree with the comments that reviving rarely happened due to the lack of consequences of respawning.

        • reply
          September 8, 2016 7:55 PM

          Ttk was so low it was really hard to get in that syringe animation when u die in .3 sec from enemy fire

    • reply
      September 8, 2016 5:48 PM

      [deleted]

Hello, Meet Lola