Elite: Dangerous will forego offline play

Elite: Dangerous will arrive on PC next month, but it will not feature offline play.

21

Elite: Dangerous is set to launch in December, but it appears that it will launch without one of its planned feature. Offline play is no longer on the table, according to Frontier Developments, turning the game into an online-only experience. Studio head David Braben points out that the developer's updates to the game make online-only central to the overall experience.

"Going forwards, being online lets us constantly both curate and evolve the galaxy, with stories unfolding according to the actions of commanders," Braben stated in an email newsletter (via Eurogamer). "Exploration is also a key factor, too, and it is important that what a single player explores matches what other players explore whether single or multiplayer – a complex, coherent world – something we have achieved. Galaxy, story, missions, have to match, and it does mean the single player has to connect to the server from time to time, but this has the added advantage that everyone can participate in the activities that can happen in the galaxy. A fully offline experience would be unacceptably limited and static compared to the dynamic, ever unfolding experience we are delivering."

"The problem is that the galaxy mechanics all sit on the online servers," executive producer Michael Brooks added on the Frontier forums. "The data set and processes are huge and not something that would translate offline without considerable compromise to the vision."

Elite: Dangerous is set to launch on December 16 on PC.

Senior Editor

Ozzie has been playing video games since picking up his first NES controller at age 5. He has been into games ever since, only briefly stepping away during his college years. But he was pulled back in after spending years in QA circles for both THQ and Activision, mostly spending time helping to push forward the Guitar Hero series at its peak. Ozzie has become a big fan of platformers, puzzle games, shooters, and RPGs, just to name a few genres, but he’s also a huge sucker for anything with a good, compelling narrative behind it. Because what are video games if you can't enjoy a good story with a fresh Cherry Coke?

From The Chatty
  • reply
    November 17, 2014 11:30 AM

    Ozzie Mejia posted a new article, Elite: Dangerous will forego offline play

    • reply
      November 17, 2014 11:32 AM

      [deleted]

    • reply
      November 17, 2014 11:38 AM

      I actually would like to see more online only games like this. Much better to have online only games that actually use being online as a feature rather than just as security. I can see some of the kickstarter backers going mad over this though. I backed on kickstarter though and don't mind :).

      • reply
        November 17, 2014 12:09 PM

        I personally enjoyed the offline mode available in Elite Dangerous. Sometimes I just didn't feel like dealing with the inevitable pricks that race through the universe and just wanted to enjoy some nice relaxing space trucking. The fact that they've remove offline play completely is annoying, and is a bit of a cop-out considering they've had it in since early beta phases.

        • reply
          November 17, 2014 12:11 PM

          ya this. when you have only a small window where you can play it's frustrating to have to deal with other people with far too much time on their hands

          • reply
            November 17, 2014 12:18 PM

            You guys should probably read the article again. Offline single-player has been removed, you can still play the game alone in online single-player.

            • reply
              November 17, 2014 12:28 PM

              I understand what the article says. I just still enjoyed the offline mode. Why should my singleplayer world trade routes be affected by what online players do? It shouldn't. The point of singleplayer, in my opinion, is to allow you to remove yourself from the constraints of the MP world. But that's just my view on things.

              • reply
                November 17, 2014 12:34 PM

                Ah, sorry. Now I get it.
                I don't really have a problem with it, but I see where you're coming from. This will largely depend on how flexible and volatile the market is going to be. It would suck to lose money on a trip because you had to take an unexpected break.

                Personally, I'd rather have an evolving world that I can chose to be alone in, than have a static one where I'm limited to playing alone forever.

        • reply
          November 17, 2014 12:23 PM

          you can still play that mode, you just need to be connected to the servers because its ultimately the same universe everyone else is playing in, you just cant see them.

        • reply
          November 17, 2014 1:05 PM

          they didn't remove online single-player; they decided not to implement offline single-player

          • reply
            November 18, 2014 6:16 PM

            I was under the impression there was already OFFLINE singleplayer as I played it a good bit and my trade routes were never affected by the stuff happening online. It's possible I misunderstood, but still. Since it is something they originally planned there may have been people who bought it for the offline mode.

    • reply
      November 17, 2014 11:57 AM

      I haven't invested in this game yet, so I'm firmly on the sideline still. But, this sure reads like a cop-out. Translation: "It was going to be too expensive since we didn't actually build the game with single player in mind, and we're pretty much out of money to do so." At least that's what it sounded like from the article.

      • reply
        November 17, 2014 12:41 PM

        I don't think they've removed solo play, though, which has been available in the betas already.

        • reply
          November 17, 2014 12:44 PM

          Right, it's more like how Diablo is where you still have to connect to Bnet. I'm okay with that. My view is just that it sounds like they may have marketed the game as support offline play, but they didn't design the game to support it initially. They may have had the thought they'd be able to decouple the game for offline and it just got away from them. So, now it would just cost too much to actually do it.

          I could be totally wrong. Again, I'm just saying how the article came across to me.

          • reply
            November 17, 2014 1:07 PM

            It sounds like its a bit better than DIablo as that's always on. When they say "Need to connect to the server from time to time" that sounds like a lost internet connection won't mean an instant removal from the game.

            That is how I read it anyway.

            • reply
              November 17, 2014 1:34 PM

              From time to time means communicating with the server every hyperspace jump from system to system, from system to station jump and pretty much any action in the station menu.

      • reply
        November 17, 2014 1:16 PM

        Ok, I went back and re-read the Kickstarter page. It never said offline play. It talked about single player with periodic connection to the server. It mentioned it 'might' be possible to do this completely offline, but it wasn't promised. So, I take back my comment about them running out of money and a limit of the design. It's actually what they mentioned originally. It sounds like they've just decided to go the Bnet-ish route in the end.

        • reply
          November 17, 2014 1:32 PM

          From their FAQ on the kickstarter page:

          How will single player work? Will I need to connect to a server to play?

          The galaxy for Elite: Dangerous is a shared universe maintained by a central server. All of the meta data for the galaxy is shared between players. This includes the galaxy itself as well as transient information like economies. The aim here is that a player's actions will influence the development of the galaxy, without necessarily having to play multiplayer.

          The other important aspect for us is that we can seed the galaxy with events, often these events will be triggered by player actions. With a living breathing galaxy players can discover new and interesting things long after they have started playing.

          Update! The above is the intended single player experience. However it will be possible to have a single player game without connecting to the galaxy server. You won't get the features of the evolving galaxy (although we will investigate minimising those differences) and you probably won't be able to sync between server and non-server (again we'll investigate).


          I'm fine with them dropping the offline part, but I can understand people not being happy about this.

          • reply
            November 17, 2014 1:32 PM

            That's what I was referring to in my comment.

            • reply
              November 17, 2014 1:36 PM

              Yeah, I wasn't reading your comment correctly. Does save other people from digging through their FAQ :0

    • reply
      November 17, 2014 1:18 PM

      [deleted]

    • reply
      November 17, 2014 1:54 PM

      the number 1 backer requested a refund and his forum account locked over this

    • reply
      November 17, 2014 1:57 PM

      I do feel bad now, for everyone who has shitty connections and/or are currently deployed.

      I have a buddy stationed onship right now, and he's not happy about this at all.

    • reply
      November 17, 2014 2:18 PM

      Jesus, fuck online-only play.

      • reply
        November 17, 2014 2:26 PM

        But it's so good. =(

        I agree that it's a pisser they're announcing this now as a fait accompli.

    • reply
      November 17, 2014 2:25 PM

      * S I M C I T Y ' D *

    • reply
      November 17, 2014 2:44 PM

      [deleted]

    • reply
      November 17, 2014 3:07 PM

      doesn't matter to me at all

    • reply
      November 18, 2014 5:11 AM

      [deleted]

Hello, Meet Lola