Command & Conquer ceases production, Victory Games shut down
Command & Conquer has closed its alpha test and ceased production on the game in its current state. The announcement comes on the heels of rumors that Victory Games, formerly known as BioWare Victory, has been shut down.
Update: EA has confirmed that Victory Games has been shut down.
Command & Conquer, the free-to-play game formerly known as Generals 2, has closed its alpha test and ceased production on the game in its current state. The announcement comes on the heels of rumors that Victory Games, formerly known as BioWare Victory, has been shut down by publisher EA.
An official statement from the Command & Conquer website explains:
Part of being in a creative team is the understanding that not all of your choices are going to work out. In this case, we shifted the game away from campaign mode and built an economy-based, multiplayer experience. Your feedback from the alpha trial is clear: We are not making the game you want to play. That is why, after much difficult deliberation, we have decided to cease production of this version of the game. Although we deeply respect the great work done by our talented team, ultimately it’s about getting you the game you expect and deserve.
Rumors of the Austin, TX studio's closure stem from an individual alleging to be a Victory Games employee. The individual's email confirms that production on Command & Conquer has ceased entirely and that the entire staff has been laid off. Shacknews has reached out to EA for confirmation.
EA has confirmed the closure to Polygon, stating, "The team at Victory Games will be disbanded. Wherever possible, we are working to help these talented people find other opportunities within EA."
-
Ozzie Mejia posted a new article, Command & Conquer ceases production.
Command & Conquer has closed its alpha test and ceased production on the game in its current state. The announcement comes on the heels of rumors that Victory Games, formerly known as BioWare Victory, has been shut down.-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
How many of the originals did you play? What was your favorite?
How was the interface? Friendly? Pretty? Well organized?
How extensive was the tech tree? Lots of buildings? Defenses? WALLS??????
Were the games fast paced and tactical or more geared towards production and industrial strategy?
How was the soundtrack? -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
I'm sad about how EA has dragged Command & Conquer through the mud for the past 4+ years (and I haven't even played any of the C&C games).
Command & Conquer 4 was announced in July 2009, as an "always-on single-player campaign" ...and later on it was revealed (I forget where or by which news source) that the project was originally going to be a multiplayer-focused title (maybe even download-only), but then it was decided that it would have a campaign (but still hang onto the always-on DRM, which didn't have enough public outrage built up at the time to be opposed in the product design phase, apparently!). It launched, it got terrible reviews, and an even worse response to the persistent-connection DRM. In November 2009, rumors abounded that the entire C&C4 team at EA LA was laid off, pretty much only leaving the team working on Medal of Honor 2010 in the building.
Generals 2 (and the studio "Bioware Victory") was announced in December 2011 at the VGAs: http://www.shacknews.com/article/71505/command-conquer-generals-2-runs-on-frostbite-2-coming-2013 . Fans said it looked interesting, but in August 2012 they made the "it's going free to play" announcement, and then painted themseives into a corner that the fans wouldn't have liked, wouldn't have been economically sustainable, and apparently was also not in line with executive decisions after Andrew Wilson took over as CEO.
I hope EA eventually makes an actual, worthy C&C game... but I have no idea what dev team is going to do that, considering that EA has starved away Westwood, EA LA, and Victory. Let's let it lie fallow for at least 3 years, I guess.
-