Splinter Cell: Blacklist trailer exercises its freedoms
Ubisoft has released a new trailer for Splinter Cell: Blacklist, showing Sam Fisher
After a short foray into vigilantism, Sam Fisher's next game, Splinter Cell: Blacklist, appears to reference a lot of familiar territory. So we see more of his iconic night-vision goggles, the support of a large government agency, and now, references to his "fifth freedom."
In the story, this means he can protect people's freedom by any means necessary. In practice, those means usually involve killing lots and lots of people. So not surprisingly, the gameplay segments we do see in the new trailer involve Sam doing what he does best. The game is due next year.
-
Steve Watts posted a new article, Splinter Cell: Blacklist trailer exercises its freedoms.
Ubisoft has released a new trailer for Splinter Cell: Blacklist, showing Sam Fisher-
-
-
-
-
-
I'm so tired of how every time a company so much as acknowledges the existence of piracy, the Butthurt Brigades get all bent out of shape.
You don't pirate? Good. Neither do I. But an awful lot of PC gamers pirate frequently, and the fact that PC gamers hate to hear about it doesn't actually make it any less true.-
Pretty much true, though there's bad apples on both sides of the fence here. It seems like the only people who are willing to discuss piracy online are ones with somewhat extremist views on things. It's either "piracy killed everything and is responsible for every bad thing in gaming, DRM is fine and always worked fine for me!" or pretty much the polar opposite.
That said, the always-online DRM stuff for SP games was really, really lame. I don't think anyone's "in the wrong" for being opposed to such things, be that in the form of complaining about it online, or not purchasing the product/future products.-
I agree with everything you said. I know I can come across as the extreme type but it's not really true. Ubisoft would never have backed away from always-on if people hadn't complained so bitterly. Feedback is essential.
And I understand not buying a company's product if you don't like the conditions that come with it. What I think is just silly though, is making decisions based on a "grudge".
-
-
I am yet to see any facts about piracy rate of Ubisoft games on PC.
Worth reading:
http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2012/09/05/ubisoft-drm-piracy-interview/
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
I didn't have a problem with the previous game at all. In fact, I felt it was the best SC in a while. Sure enough, the emphasis was a bit more on the action and the game didn't force you to stealth much, but the thing is, I still sneaked around a whole lot, because I wanted to, and it worked. There were very few points at which the game forced me to "shoot it up". And when I decided it was time for the direct approach, it was cool as well compared to the older games.
It felt like playing a modern SC game with more options, and I'm looking forward to this one. Too bad it's Ubisoft, I'm curious to see what kind of DRM one can look forward to this time.-
-
I used melee takedown hell of a lot, and quite frankly I don't even understand what you mean. The stealth aspects were great for me. My take is that it was most definitely a SC game, just with a different touch, which I felt the series needed anyway after so many games with the same formula. This coming from a guy who owns all the previous games, most of them for 2 platforms, so I'm a pretty big fan.
-
-
-
-