Ubisoft exercising strict control over Assassin's Creed movie
Ubisoft's high degree of control over the Assassin's Creed movie project left a few studios cold on the project, and makes some Hollywood insiders wonder if it will ever see the light of day.
Ubisoft is exerting an unprecedented control over the movie adaptation of Assassin's Creed, leading some in Hollywood to think the project is doomed to be a non-starter. Since the franchise is such a financial success already, Sony Pictures reportedly had to agree to let Ubisoft approve large decisions as the budget, cast, script, and release date.
"The whole Ubisoft/Sony deal is a waste of ink, paper and time," said one talent agent. "The level of control Sony gave up means, effectively, that Assassin's Creed will never - and I mean never - get made."
Vulture (via OXM) reports that these creative demands could explain why DreamWorks, Universal, and Warner Bros all passed on the project. One studio chief called Ubisoft's position "ridiculous."
"It's [Ubisoft's] billion-dollar brand, so I get that they're protective," said another studio head. "But they're not moviemakers, and the only way to make sure it's a bad movie is to undervalue what movie studios do - and this is a deal that totally undervalues what movie studios do."
Another asked, "If they’re so afraid of what will happen to their franchises, why make a movie at all?"
On the other hand, Sony Pictures, which was nearing a deal a few weeks ago, might not be as crazy as the scoffers suggest. One source claims that Ubisoft kicked in a large sum of its own money for the project, making Sony responsible for much less of the initial investment than typically seen in these kinds of deals, but still able to benefit from a potential hit.
While the established studio system is skeptical about Ubisoft's film production chops, the company has been eager to branch out into other forms of media. It recently opened a film and TV division, and is already at work producing a Raving Rabbids TV series for Nickelodeon.
-
Steve Watts posted a new article, Ubisoft exercising strict control over Assassin's Creed movie.
Ubisoft's high degree of control over the Assassin's Creed movie project left a few studios cold on the project, and makes some Hollywood insiders wonder if it will ever see the light of day.-
Uh. The only thing this tells me is that I won't be able to watch (and get disappointed) another worthless movie based on a video game. For them (the movie makers) it's a lot worse, since they're only out there to make some quick cash and not a great movie. And now they might lose the cash, waah waah.
Name one game-based movie that was good and not half-rushed to only live on it's brand?-
-
Resident Evil, Silent Hill, Mortal Kombat, and a link with broken pictures http://www.destructoid.com/why-the-super-mario-movie-is-an-underappreciated-masterpiece-29694.phtml
-
-
-
-
-
I enjoyed the movie, and to date it's the 2nd most successful game-turned-into-movie of all-time (right below the first 'Tomb Raider') and it did gross over $350 million worldwide (on a $200 million budget).
http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/2010/PRSIA.php
Conversely 'Max Payne' did $85 million worldwide on a $35 million budget.
http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/2008/PAYNE.php
'Doom' did even worse, $55 million worldwide on $70 million budget (how did they spend $70 million on this?)
http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/2005/DOOM.php
-
-
-
I would rather have no Assassin's Creed movie than a terrible one (a'la Max Payne).
I found Scott Miller's thoughts on what went wrong the Max Payne movie interesting:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9LWm7CBsRQQ&feature=youtu.be&t=8m8s
-
-
Check out the end of this interview where he talks about the Immortality Institute (where he was the Director for a couple of years):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RhPvXw4cZGc&feature=youtu.be&t=13m10s
"Promoting the idea that someday we will be able to live forever"
-