GitHub laying off 10 percent of staff by FY23

The company will lay off 10 percent of its staff and cut down on office space by going fully remote.

22

As revealed by outlets like Fortune, Microsoft-owned company GitHub recently announced plans to lay off 10 percent of its staff by FY23 in addition to reducing office space by gradually transitioning to remote work. According to GitHub CEO, Thomas Dohmke, the reason for these cuts are due to “new budgetary realignments.”

“We announced a number of difficult but necessary decisions and budgetary realignments to both protect the health of our business in the short term and grant us the capacity to invest in our long-term strategy moving forward,” a GitHub spokesperson shared with Fortune in a written statement.

GitHub office space in Bellevue, Washington as shared by Interior Architects
© GitHub, Interior Architects

Not only is GitHub laying off 10 percent of its staff, it’s also reducing office space due to “very low utilization rates” with plans to go fully remote, though it’s noted that GitHub isn’t planning to vacate its offices immediately.

“We are not vacating offices immediately, but will move to close all of our offices as their leases end or as we are operationally able to do so,” Dohmke wrote in a message to GitHub staff. Other details included in Dohmke’s statement includes a hiring pause which was first announced on January 18 and continues to remain in effect.

GitHub office space showing a communal area with large wooden tables and rustic lighting
© GitHub, TechCrunch

Those impacted by layoffs will receive transition compensation and COBRA/COBRA equivalent, along with career transitions services assistance benefits. For more on GitHub’s plans to lay off 10 percent of staff and transition to remote work, be sure to read through the coverage from Fortune which includes the full statement to employees from GitHub CEO, Thomas Dohmke.

GitHub’s upcoming layoffs follows several other companies who’ve recently announced layoffs including Yahoo which plans to lay off 20 percent of its staff by the end of 2023, and Zoom which will lay off 15 percent of its workforce, or around 1,300 employees.

Senior Editor

Morgan is a writer from the frozen wastelands of Maine who enjoys metal music, kpop, horror, and indie games. They're also a Tetris fanatic who's fiercely competitive in games like Tetris 99... and all games in general. But mostly Tetris. You can follow Morgan on Twitter @Author_MShaver.

From The Chatty
  • reply
    February 9, 2023 1:45 PM

    Morgan Shaver posted a new article, GitHub laying off 10 percent of staff by FY23

    • reply
      February 9, 2023 12:23 PM

      GitHub is doing layoffs, 10%

      They are also closing the offices, going fully remote, plus increasing the hardware renewal period from 3 years to 4 years.

      https://fortune.com/2023/02/09/github-is-laying-off-10-of-staff-and-cutting-down-office-space/

      • reply
        February 9, 2023 12:34 PM

        [deleted]

      • reply
        February 9, 2023 12:42 PM

        Yeah, my friend just got laid off today from GitHub, if anyone knows of an openings he's looking for some more work atm. He lives in Orlando, FL if that matters.

      • reply
        February 9, 2023 12:42 PM

        Multiple tech companies hitting per day now, so many I'm not even sure if it's hitting the news.

        Affirm (19%) and Gusto (5%) yesterday
        Github (10%), Gitlab (7%) and Yahoo (20%) so far today

        Yahoo's is 1600 people.

      • reply
        February 9, 2023 12:51 PM

        [deleted]

        • reply
          February 9, 2023 12:52 PM

          Profits are down. But they need to pay shareholders. So naturally they fire people.

          • reply
            February 9, 2023 5:41 PM

            "Profits are down" meaning - they still made profits, but they made *less* profits than they *feel* like they could, right?

        • reply
          February 9, 2023 12:53 PM

          One company does it then all the other companies follow because it drives up the share price.

        • reply
          February 9, 2023 12:56 PM

          These decisions were made in September/October of last year

        • reply
          February 9, 2023 12:58 PM

          [deleted]

          • reply
            February 9, 2023 1:07 PM

            it's fascinating. and to your point, I've seen a huge uptick in recruiters reaching out to me over the past few weeks

            • reply
              February 9, 2023 1:18 PM

              [deleted]

              • reply
                February 9, 2023 1:55 PM

                hahaha MLB reached out to me a few times for devops roles but their salary range is below what I was making at the time. it was with their statistics team / group iirc, which would have been super cool

          • reply
            February 9, 2023 1:16 PM

            Yeah, hirings aren’t headline worthy

          • reply
            February 9, 2023 5:56 PM

            The media here is just reporting the facts (this particular article anyways). I don't see any sensationalized editorials here.

          • reply
            February 9, 2023 6:46 PM

            And maximum harm to productivity

          • reply
            February 9, 2023 8:55 PM

            As I’ve heard elsewhere, it’s a Patagonia recession.

          • reply
            February 9, 2023 9:05 PM

            sounds like cowardice

          • reply
            February 10, 2023 6:10 AM

            It's exactly this, some are over-extended but it's easy to do right now without taking a rep or stock price hit.

        • reply
          February 9, 2023 1:07 PM

          Shareholder ROI is more important than retaining labor

        • reply
          February 9, 2023 1:12 PM

          Group think.

        • reply
          February 9, 2023 1:15 PM

          Labor is super weak in this country

        • reply
          February 9, 2023 1:19 PM

          I think a lot of companies changed (i.e., hired) to meet higher demand during covid. We also had an economy that was running arguably a bit too hot at that point, leading to relatively more disposable income. Things are cooler now and companies are wanting to maintain margins they thought they would get under a different economic climate.

          Then a bunch of others think they should do it because their peers are doing it.

        • reply
          February 9, 2023 1:26 PM

          usually it's fiscal calendar stuff innit? make those Q1 #s pop!

        • reply
          February 9, 2023 1:50 PM

          Any excuse to do it without scrutiny is welcomed for profit. You get a few giant tech layoffs and all tech companies suddenly feel like they can do it without being scrutinized. And it's true.

        • reply
          February 9, 2023 2:27 PM

          [deleted]

        • reply
          February 9, 2023 3:01 PM

          CEOs don't actually know what they're doing and follow trends, same as everyone else.

        • reply
          February 9, 2023 5:46 PM

          Capitalism and greed

        • reply
          February 9, 2023 6:38 PM

          Musk showed everyone that you can lay off most of your engineers and everything will work out fine.

          • reply
            February 9, 2023 6:47 PM

            crazy how you only need half the amount of staff to support a website with half the amount of advertisers and visitors

          • reply
            February 9, 2023 6:51 PM

            Microservices find a way

          • reply
            February 9, 2023 7:06 PM

            "fine" lol

            • reply
              February 9, 2023 9:04 PM

              From an external perspective, my Twitter experience is no different to me now than it was before pre-Elon.

              • reply
                February 9, 2023 9:28 PM

                It is for me. I feel gross every time I click on a Twitter link.

        • reply
          February 10, 2023 7:13 AM

          A lot of these companies over-hired with the intention that they could just lay off the lower performers after a while when things return to normal.

      • reply
        February 9, 2023 1:50 PM

        $ for employee in $layoffs
        do
        git add $employee
        done

        $ git layoff
        $ git profit -lol]s

      • reply
        February 9, 2023 2:26 PM

        [deleted]

        • reply
          February 9, 2023 5:40 PM

          Survivor guilt is a thing in layoffs. Makes for a shitty day, week.

      • reply
        February 9, 2023 6:23 PM

        Damn, the remaining four people are gonna have a lot on their plate

        • reply
          February 9, 2023 6:26 PM

          Yeah, gonna be rough maintaining those news aggregator feeds!

        • reply
          February 9, 2023 6:37 PM

          It's 1,600 people getting cut. Yahoo's revenue is roughly 8 billion annually.

          • reply
            February 10, 2023 6:08 AM

            Yeah, they are giving up on rolling their own advertising entity (supply side). read most the cuts are in that division. President said they just poured money in it and it never paid off.

        • reply
          February 9, 2023 6:38 PM

          More like 1,600 remaining.

        • reply
          February 9, 2023 9:22 PM

          Waffle stomping indeed

    • reply
      February 9, 2023 6:41 PM

      Well over 13,000 people laid off this week.

      • reply
        February 10, 2023 3:26 AM

        Completely fine. I'm sure the amount of service jobs have tripled to make room for these folks. /s

Hello, Meet Lola