Mick Gordon shares statement about Marty Stratton and Doom Eternal
Gordon talks about enduring crunch while working on Doom Eternal, being without pay for 11 months, and more.
Composer Mick Gordon shared a statement today in which he talks about some of the difficult circumstances that he endured while working on Doom Eternal. The statement comes as a direct response to id Software Studio Director Marty Stratton’s open letter on the Doom Eternal OST published to Reddit back in May of 2020.
According to Gordon, Stratton outright lied about the circumstances surrounding Doom Eternal’s OST and “used disinformation and innuendo” to blame Gordon for its failure. Additionally, Stratton reportedly offered Gordon a six-figure settlement to never speak about it publicly.
As for what Gordon was discouraged from talking about specifically, his statement opens by remarking on how id Software handed him a music schedule requiring “two levels scored per month.” Even though release of the game was two years away at that point, the schedule demanded Gordon deliver “a steady stream of final music immediately.”
Gordon suggested a schedule change, but this ended up being struck down by Stratton.
Because Stratton refused to budge on the schedule, Gordon stuck with it, pulling all-nighters despite there being 18 months left before the game’s release. As the game took shape during the development process, Gordon’s previous concerns were seemingly proven valid as his guesswork on the compositions no longer fit.
As the situation surrounding Doom Eternal’s soundtrack continued to escalate, Gordon reports being shut out of meetings, his emails going unanswered, and things like the mandated file transfer system auto-deleting music files every two weeks.
Outside of crunch, Gordon also experienced issues when it came to getting paid for the work that he’d done due to id Software not liking what he’d delivered.
He goes on to note that the audio team grew increasingly reluctant to sign off on anything that he delivered and began withholding approvals (and payment) for months, with Gordon stating that starting in January of 2019, he went 11 months without pay.
The statement contains mention of other problematic situations including Stratton announcing the release of Doom Eternal on November 22 alongside a special Collector’s Edition featuring “Mick Gordon’s original Doom Eternal soundtrack.” Pre-orders for the Collector’s Edition were immediately available and sold out within days, even though the standalone OST wasn’t in production at the time. Gordon hadn’t even been offered a contract to produce it.
Once Doom Eternal was released Gordon came to find out that id Software used “nearly all the music” he’d produced throughout development “almost five hours worth” despite only paying for half that.
All in all, the statement from Gordon on the rocky development of Doom Eternal's soundtrack is eye-opening and packed full of other disconcerting details. For more of what Gordon went through, be sure to read through his full statement.
Also brush up on some of our previous coverage including Doom Eternal Composer Mick Gordon expressing discontent with id & Bethesda back in 2020, and the original open letter from Doom Eternal producer Marty Stratton in 2020 on the controversy surrounding the game’s soundtrack.
-
Morgan Shaver posted a new article, Mick Gordon shares statement about Marty Stratton and Doom Eternal
-
-
-
-
-
Under https://medium.com/@mickgordon/my-full-statement-regarding-doom-eternal-5f98266b27ce#2570
Settlement offer negotiations
id Software and Zenimax engaged a large multi-national law firm as representation, and we began settlement negotiations. I demanded Marty withdraw his false accusations and issue an apology. But they rejected this on Marty’s concern that if he admitted fault publicly, that would negatively affect his reputation.
Instead, they proposed a deal: they would pay me the money owed, but on the condition I produce a new, polished version of the DOOM Eternal OST, appearing to suggest that if I gave them something to sell, that would somehow make up for the damage Marty had caused to my reputation.
...
But lawyers acting on Marty’s behalf expressed worry that even removing the post would reflect poorly on his reputation, which struck me as profoundly hypocritical: he should have thought about that before posting it in the first place.
In response, I told them my acceptance of their settlement offer was tied to the condition that Marty would remove the post immediately. -
-
-
A correction serves the same purpose. Reddit is a neutral ground, removing the post serves no benefit. Someone searching Mick's name is going to hit a bunch of articles about that post.
The subreddit has tagged Marty's post as "misleading" and linked to Mick's rebuttal in a pinned comment. I think that's a fair compromise and something I am sure they would have done if a correction was posted by Id or Zenimax.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-