Apple CEO Tim Cook on data privacy: "What kind of world do we want to live in?"
The head honcho of the world's largest company weighed in on privacy at this year's International Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners.
Earlier today in Brussels, Apple CEO Tim Cook spoke at this year's International Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners. Please take a look at his full keynote address.
He took to Twitter to share his thoughts on data privacy.
It was an honor to be invited to #ICDPPC2018 in Brussels this morning. I’d like to share a bit of what I said to this gathering of privacy regulators from around the world. It all boils down to a fundamental question: What kind of world do we want to live in?
— Tim Cook (@tim_cook) October 24, 2018
Here are everyone of Tim Cook's tweets from the thread mashed together in more readable format:
It was an honor to be invited to #ICDPPC2018 in Brussels this morning. I’d like to share a bit of what I said to this gathering of privacy regulators from around the world. It all boils down to a fundamental question: What kind of world do we want to live in? GDPR has shown us all that good policy and political will can come together to protect the rights of everyone. We believe that privacy is a fundamental human right. No matter what country you live in, that right should be protected in keeping with four essential principles:
First, companies should challenge themselves to de-identify customer data or not collect that data in the first place.
Second, users should always know what data is being collected from them and what it’s being collected for. This is the only way to empower users to decide what collection is legitimate and what isn’t. Anything less is a sham.
Third, companies should recognize that data belongs to users and we should make it easy for people to get a copy of their personal data, as well as correct and delete it.
And fourth, everyone has a right to the security of their data. Security is at the heart of all data privacy and privacy rights.
Technology is capable of doing great things. But it doesn’t want to do great things. It doesn’t want anything. That part takes all of us. We are optimistic about technology’s awesome potential for good — but we know that it won’t happen on its own.
Cook during his keynote address at ICDPPC 2018 stated that he would be open to U.S. federal regulation of data privacy, saying that data collection is being "weaponized against us with military efficiency." "We shouldn't sugarcoat the consequences. This is surveillance. And these stockpiles of personal data serve only to enrich the companies that collect them," Cook said. "This should make us very uncomfortable. It should unsettle us." Cook's vision for data privacy in the tech sector is not that crazy.
Apple's CEO laid out four very clear bullet points regarding users' right to privacy. "We at Apple are in full support of a comprehensive federal privacy law in the United States. There and everywhere, it should be rooted in four essential rights: First, the right to have personal data minimized. Companies should challenge themselves to de-identify customer data — or not to collect it in the first place. Second, the right to knowledge. Users should always know what data is being collected and what it is being collected for. This is the only way to empower users to decide what collection is legitimate and what isn't. Anything less is a sham. Third, the right to access. Companies should recognize that data belongs to users, and we should all make it easy for users to get a copy of, correct and delete their personal data. And fourth, the right to security. Security is foundational to trust and all other privacy rights."
Apple has been a leader on the data privacy front for years, and while they are the largest tech behemoth in the world, it is great to see the company hold onto their values and respect their customers. What say you, Shackers? Do you enjoy spoonfeeding Facebook and Google all of your private information so they can profit off of you with advertising and selling your data? Would you like to see U.S. regulators tackle this issue? Let us know in the comments section.
-
Asif Khan posted a new article, Apple CEO Tim Cook on data privacy: "What kind of world do we want to live in?"
-
-
Tim Cook will be gone within 3-5 years, as Apple tries and fails to find a new high-growth market, or innovate in existing markets (re: a thin touch-screen bar on a laptop? really? A notch on a phone?... ughh). And going with him, will be Apple's stance on strong privacy.
AR is the next high-growth market, and we haven't seen shit from Apple aside from a software SDK. People will slowly switch from smartphone to a Google Glass like solution, and unless Apple can capitalize on that trend, they are in for a bumpy ride.-
-
-
-
-
You are crazy. And by crazy I mean fucking out of your mind.
Tim has lead Apple to amazing growth and they are doing just fine. And anyone who points to the notch as an issue 1. Hasn’t used it (non issue) 2. Doesn’t know why it’s there from a design and materials point 3. Doesnt pay attention to hardware sales.-
-
-
-
-
-
$1000 for a phone you keep for 3-4 years vs $600 for a phone you keep every 2 years is actually a lower total cost of ownership compared to the past. Sales are showing that Apple customers found $600 for the phone was actually delivering consumer surplus. They've been raising the ASP for multiple years now and sales have only grown. Your thesis does not match the sales data or customer satisfaction data that's out there.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Literally all of those, were under Jobs' tenure though. '97 to '11
Macintosh. Jobs. ('84?85?)
iMac G3. Jobs.
iPod. Jobs.
iPhone. Jobs.
iPad. Jobs.
Their Apple Watch is the only thing I have seen them do that wasn't Jobs. I'm skeptical they can pull off another big product launch that gives them large growth.
I'm not saying they have to be a market leader now, in VR/AR. But I haven't seen anything from them side from fancy camera apps... which my PS Vita could do like 6-7 years ago. Has me worried, because AR/VR isn't just shrinking down a phone to fit on your wrist. It's a whole host problems that are not easy to solve, and Apple is putting out laptops with touch bars on them, and charging $1400 for a faster smart phone.
We shall see.
-
-
-
-
-
Apple has the best wireless earbuds, the best wearable, and the best, most powerful mobile CPU/GPU to power AR/VR, and a set of customers who are happy to pay a premium for quality. And they have an enormous ecosystem and set of developers making content for their platform. Few companies are better positioned for AR/VR on hardware or software, let alone both.
-
-
-
-
Best phone and Laptop is arguable. Samsung and Microsoft both give them a run for their money in those product lines.
>Plus they are the only company committed to not making money on your data and actually protecting your privacy.
This actually has me slightly worried for their future. I mean... I think privacy is super important. I've had threads about trying to get off the Google ecosystem. But so much of the innovation coming forward is going to come from AI and machine learning... how are they going to train a Siri assistant without enough user input? Facebook and Google are collecting that shit like crazy, and building entire services off of it. How is Apple going to compete with neural nets that are created from the meta-data of 100's of millions of users?
-
-
I know what his next job will be!
https://twitter.com/business/status/1031643513413283840
-
-
-
-
They didn't really miss it, it was never aligned with their skills or organization. But it means now it's very easy for them to claim privacy is very important because it costs them very little and hurts their competitors tremendously.
Everyone deserves privacy! /refuses to sell phones for less than $600
It's like Google and Facebook claiming everyone deserves free access to the internet and the best free, connected services with it. Like, ok yeah maybe they do, but I can't help but notice that's also the most profitable outcome for you and hurts your competitors who can't make money at the same scale with ads...
-
-
-