PlayStation 4 review: greatness awaits
PS4 has the advantage on paper and is the clear value winner of next-gen. However, it's lacking in features at launch.
The lightbar is surprisingly useful, the touchpad not so much
Goodbye XMB, hello PlayStation Dynamic Menu
Kevin Butler would be sad
Voice commands don't require a camera; you can use the headset
Remote Play almost works as advertised
Sharing content is easy, but the tools leave a lot to be desired
This PlayStation 4 review was based on a 500GB retail system provided by the publisher. Sony also provided Shacknews transportation to New York City for the purpose of picking up the PS4 system.
-
Andrew Yoon posted a new article, PlayStation 4 review: greatness awaits.
PS4 has the advantage on paper and is the clear value winner of next-gen. However, it's lacking in features at launch.-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
It has already been confirmed that PS4 will have MP3 and DLNA. The Kinect doesn't add any value for a LOT of people. The interactive media features don't add value for a lot of people either.
Fact is, if you're looking to get the best GAMING experience for the lowest price, PS4 is by far the better value. -
I also said "FOR THE GAMER".
Kinect's value is only potential right now... for the gamer
interactive media doesn't add anything...for the gamer
DLNA - nope....for the gamer
Mp3 - yes in certain games...CD??? are you kdding?
HBO Go- okay now your just reaching.
In the context of gaming little of that matters. Now I agree that here is some value to the above (but there is also a cost as you likely need Gold to use all that in addition to the extra $100)
Since you see if that way, you are going with the Xbox one. Personally I see more "value" in remote play than all those things....that's why I'm going PS4.
Reviews don't have to be objective, ya know. In fact, they aren't supposed to be. -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
The car analogy is out of place here. What we're actually comparing are pretty close to parity in feature set, with a little bit of "apples and oranges" to boot. The PS4 does this while the XB1 does that. Some features one has that the other doesn't will be available, and some won't. As it stands, the PS4 featureset combined with possible software updates over the next ~10 years is a better value than the XB1, which I think the shack review was correct on. I regret even getting involved with the stupid, inevitable car as analogy because it just doesn't apply here
-
-
-
Is there some secret we're completely unaware of? We've seen the UI, Kinect, the games, we know the policies in place, etc.
For the Xbone to be a better value, the features would have to overcome the media paywall and inferior hardware power. The review isn't up yet, but you think Andrew wrote that without having any insight into why the PS4 is a better value?
You get a more powerful machine for less money, access to streaming services, free games, and free credits for their store.
The difference is in the Kinect and I find it hard to believe that the device and its integration with the software is going to somehow overcome the deficits to become a better value. It might have different (and for some people greater potential) than the PS4, but that doesn't make the launch system better by the dollar unless you want the one thing the PS4 can't do.
The review will be out soon enough although I will be surprised if there is much to learn. The only new information in this review to me was watching the UI in action.
-
-
The XB1 will do some things the PS4 doesn't, and the PS4 will do some things the XB1 won't. At the same time, every single component inside the PS4 is more powerful than the XB1 and it's $100 cheaper. And even if we want to ride the slippery slope of "What ifs" and factor the cost of the PS Eye in to bring it up to equal pricing with the XB1, the PS4 still wins out on power alone.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Yea, I find the price argument a little false since the system clearly has things that were built around the early idea to include the camera in the box. It almost seems like they decided to yank it just to undercut the Xbox One on price, but at the sacrifice of some work that went into the system design.
-
-
I don't know if it was so much a "last minute" thing as it is a half-hearted thing - quite similar to that surprise announcement that the Six Axis would have motion capabilities - which amounted to pretty much nothing. I anticipate the camera will be relegated to the same fate. tbh, I'm fine with that at the lower pricepoint.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Unless the XBO has some surprise waiting for us, I think it's safe to say that we know what each system is launching with and can evaluate value pretty readily. Obviously YMMV, since the media features of the XBO (including TV) are highly dependent on your own current media habits and (I assume) what part of the world you're in and how well it integrates with your TV/cable.
-
Apps like Hulu, Netflix, etc... tie into the X1's One Guide. While it might not be important to you, the X1 is apparently built with people who use apps to watch TV in mind. They have demoed this feature in their SkyDrive video and a few other videos.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=E2Vlsqft27I
-
-
-
-
-
-
I never had slow downloads on PS3, but I've always been direct-connected. I will test wi-fi later to give you an answer!
PlayStation Store is identical on PS3 and PS4. You can download content and start playing before it finishes downloading. A notification pops up letting you know when you can play.
No more PlayStation Home.-
I'm hardwired on my PS3 with a 100meg cable modem connection. PSN downloads have always taken a long time compared to Xbox or Steam. I've even DMZ'd the PS3 and tried direct connections and it didn't seem to help. Maybe it's just my location in the US, but other people I know (out of state) experience similar issues.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
I really think that most people are blowing this whole no playing videos off external media/no MP3 support thing out of proportion. Things are clearing moving more towards a streaming model as far as digital media goes. I think they covered their bases as far as video streaming goes right out the gate, but I can't believe they don't have any kind of Pandora, Spotify, or Rdio apps. As long as they give us options, I'm OK with just having streaming media on PS4.
Now as far as CD support...I really wish they had added that in. The CD was developed in part by Sony. CDs are still sold in stores...they aren't exactly dead yet.-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
That's trivializing the issue. I watch video off of USB drives constantly; it's more reliable than streaming due to our shaky WiFi.
The point is, why take away features? Yesterday, I think it was, Sony backpedaled and assured gamers that many features such as MP3 playback were due in a patch down the road.-
I would guess it's a matter of priorities.
If you look at the game related features, they all seem to be there and they actually work. They also seemed to have spent a lot of pre-launch time developing and providing a solid development environment.
Yoshida seemed to have expressed genuine surprise that there was an actual demand for stuff like MP3 playback and DNLA so they probably just weren't planning for it since realistically it's probably not very highly utilized by their current PS3 userbase.
The only real WTF launch issue I've seen with the PS4 is the lack of the low power/suspend state considering that it was a major talking point at the reveal and the thing has dedicated hardware to support this feature. They must be having major issues with getting it working correctly. -
You say "take away" as if the PS4 just gets all the PS3 features for free and then Sony actively spends work removing things. It's not like that. Everything has a cost to design, develop and test and there are only so many man hours available to do so and more desirable features than time. If only 1% of people play media off a USB drive then how important is that feature for launch? Not very. If it's a deal breaker for someone then that person can buy the console later, it's not like Sony is going to have trouble moving stock in the first 6 months without it. Even more so when it's a feature that should be used even less in the future than it is now.
They're advertising features like Vita remote play, if your WiFi can't even stream a video reliably within the house you're far from their ideal customer right now...-
-
it certainly isn't free to develop and test (what's the UI look like to interact with the drive? can it keep playing in the background with the OS? how does it do that? does the OS properly handle reading/writing to the drive without corrupting it if powered off mid read/write? etc, etc). Features aren't free, even ones you think are old and simple. If very few people use it, and fewer still in the future, then it is not a high priority. Sony is absolutely better off spending those man hours on making the marketplace or some other core feature better, more responsive, more featureful, etc.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
great, you are also the 1% if you regularly played legitimate video off of a USB device. Others feel free to chime in and I will also call you the 1%.
Were you going to buy a launch PS4 until you learned this? Doesn't matter, there's no shortage of early other customers who care more about a ton of other features that actually exist. Are you now never going to buy a PS4 even after they add it post launch? Unless there are a lot of people like you, that also doesn't even matter. -
-
-
-
-
Great Review!
Good job not giving the system a pass for not supporting the functions that are currently available on the PS3. I was also not aware that the PS4 would support any sort of multiple app function. so that's great news.
One question: It's always bothered me that the PS3 doesn't support a party chat feature like Xbox. Does PS4 support a chat system like this or is it still a separate function?
Maybe I missed this information over the last few months so if anyone can clear it up that would be great. -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Any plan for a review update since the 1.5 update was released today?
http://us.playstation.com/support/systemupdates/ps4/index.htm -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
"Crucially, PS4 is a powerful system with a terrific controller. For gamers, that's all that matters. "
No, the games actually matter too, and other features also matter.
"Coming in $100 cheaper than Xbox One, it's undeniable that PS4 should be the next-gen console of choice for gamers that are mindful of their budget"
You haven't provided an analysis of what the Xbox One offers for the extra $100. Without looking at that you can't proclaim something to be a better value. Just like a $5 game is not always a better value than a $20 game if the $20 game offers something unique. The word is "cheaper".
-