Diablo 3 real-money auction house to require authenticator
Having your Diablo III account hacked and plundered already sucks, but it'd be far worse if you'd paid money for that gear. So Blizzard will require that players use a Battle.net Authenticator for the real-money auction house.
Having your Diablo III account hacked and stripped of items is horrible when you've put so many hours into getting them, but if you'd paid genuine cash money for that snazzy sword you'd be more than a mite annoyed at being plundered. As rapscallions continue to plunder accounts the length and breadth of Sanctuary, Blizzard has announced that players will be required to use a security-boosting Battle.net Authenticator to wheel and deal in the real-money auction house.
Technically, players will be required to have an Authenticator to add to their Battle.net Balance. So if you want to add money to spend on items or send the proceeds from sales back to your Balance, you'll need an authenticator, which come in both physical and mobile app form.
"While we understand that this creates an extra step for players during the login process, we believe this added layer of account protection will help foster a safer auction house environment for all of our players," Blizzard community manager 'Kaivax' posted.
And, of course, having real money at stake would mean players might respond in stronger, more litigious forms than angry forum posts if they were hacked.
Hacking has been a real problem for Diablo III since it launched last month. Though Blizzard can roll an account back to recover stolen items, it's a right royal pain in the rump. Early reports claimed that some had been hacked even with authenticators, but it seems just good old-fashioned stolen passwords are to blame.
While Diablo III has sold enormously well, hacking and the overwhelmed servers have made it far from the smoothest launch. In South Korea, Blizzard's offices were raided by the country's Fair Trade Commission following complaints from disgruntled players who were denied refunds.
-
Alice O'Connor posted a new article, Diablo 3 real-money auction house to require authenticator.
Having your Diablo III account hacked and plundered already sucks, but it'd be far worse if you'd paid money for that gear. So Blizzard will require that players use a Battle.net Authenticator for the real-money auction house.-
-
-
-
-
Software in what way? Are you talking about the phone apps? Great... if you have a smartphone. Which not everyone does.
I'm saying: Blizzard should send one (1) free hardware authenticator tp anyone who requests one. Anyone with a smart phone won't want it because it's one more damn thing to wag around. Everyone else doesn't have to spring $6 to not get fucked in the game they've already sunk $60 in. Done.
-
-
How do people like you still exist? Can you seriously not follow one step of logic? Like, the time it took you to post this, you could have thought for 5~ seconds (don't hurt yourself) and figured this one out.
-Millions of people buy d3
-Including an authenticator per box would be like $6/box
-Many people already may have an authenticator (mobile / fob) from previous games
-Many people prefer mobile authenticators which costs Blizzard nothing
Would you seriously spend $6~ of your profit per-game to include a dongle that is likely wasted in a significant portion of the audience? -
-
Automobile analogies don't work here because they're regulated by the government which requires by law that you have insurance.
As for the hone - I'm not a knife guy but this is more akin to someone selling you a house without a lock on the door. Yes, you're going to get broken into but wouldn't it make more sense to just sell the house with locks on the doors? Like they currently do?-
The reality is you WONT get hacked randomly. You did do something wrong. You can't relate that to a house without a lock. You do have a lock, but the lock can share keys with other locks you use, and lots of travelling salesman come by asking if they can inspect your house / lock and you're just a really nice person who likes to let them check it out. This is all silly, why do we need analogies?
The reality is that security is changing nowadays, and many people do not accept 2-factor authentication as required yet. It requires companies like Blizzard pushing people into thinking about security to make progress. I have lots of friends and family moving onto keepass / 2 factor for their google and it takes a lot of convincing, despite that being infinitely more important. People just don't want to think about security, and I can't blame them. It's annoying to have to deal with, but that's the times we live in now, can't argue that.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Listen you stupid fuck, I don't give a shit about their profit margin or blizzard at all. I don't play their games.
You're the fucking entitled one to think someone can't have a differing opinion than your own without devolving into asinine name-calling. Whatever you think about what I think about blizzard is wrong; get over yourself.-
-
-
I made one comment that it sounded like they were looking to score profit (rather than solve the problem). I'm not sure that's necessarily inflammatory for the average adult. Companies look to make profits. I made similar comments about Microsoft back when RROD threads were a weekly thing.
I don't have to have a vested interest in a company's games to make comments. One, it's a free country, two, it's a game forum and three, there are a lot of game companies I have nothing to do with. I never did buy a 360, yet I have owned a original xbox, ps2, gamecube, wii and PC. I probably wouldn't have bought Diablo 3, but I certainly wouldn't after this nonsense.
I replied civilly to the people that responded civilly.
That help?
-
-
-
-
RSA charges a per-token license for the authentication algorithm, it's that and not the plastic that costs money. Blizz said that they were selling authenticators at cost back when they introduced them for WoW, if you want to call that a lie then go ahead but if you distrust them that much I donno why you'd buy their products in the first place.
-
-
-
-
-
I stirred the shit above but I can understand why (if it costs $6 to make the thing) they'd not want to include one in every game because a large % of the purchasers will opt to use the phone app instead. Fair enough.
But put a coupon in the box or something for anyone who does want a hardware one - anyone with a smartphone won't want one more damn thing on their keychain, so I don't think there would be some huge influx of people asking for these things. I assume they a'ready limit it to one per Battle.net account.
-
-
-
I really wish they'd publish numbers regarding how many accounts have authenticators attached, and how many of those are the smartphone apps, so we can end this incessant talk of Blizzard scamming people. I honestly don't think the majority of people who have a PC powerful enough to play D3 are without smartphones. Since you can get smartphones for free with many carrier plans, unless you are anti-internet or something, there's almost no reason not to have one.
-
-
-
Lol GTFO out of here. You are approximately .5% of their audience. Go get a smartphone because it's 2012, and you get shit like this for free with them.
Alternatively, don't use the RMAH. And when you come back saying "you mean I bought this game and I can't even use all the features it comes with?" I'm going to laugh at you. -
-
-
-
Wait, it's even easier than that. Open-source Windows version of the Blizzard authenticator here:
http://code.google.com/p/winauth/
There is literally no excuse.-
It's best if you have two computers, but considering it seems likely that most hacks are from people using the same email / password elsewhere, and not keyloggers / trojans / voodoo, it's probably safe enough to use it on the same computer you play with. I'm using it at the moment (running it on a separate computer), and it definitely works.
-
-
-
-
-
If you already have a smart phone. Saying "Oh buy there's an emulator through which you can download and then run a program to do that" does not make it seem like something I would want to do. Maybe Bilzzard should have thought about shipping an authenticator with every boxed copy, or figure something out so these accounts don't get hacked or something.
-
-
lol
I can't use my credit card in another country unless I walk into my bank and say I'm going to be out of the country at that time. I don't believe Blizz does that, but if they do, good for them. I also have up to 250,000$, I think, insured by banks/the government so I don't really need to worry about anything getting stolen because I know I'll get it back. Pretty sure Blizzard doesn't do that either.
Now none of that matters for me, because I didn't buy that game, and shit like this is why I don't plan to any time soon.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
I know this has been discussed a ton, and I don't mean to beat a dead horse, but to me an authenticator should just be an extra security measure, not a requirement. I think Blizzard could a bit further on their end in terms of security and making things a bit safer by implementing a PC authenticator, similar to what iTunes, Paypal, or several online brokerage accounts have, where if you log in from a different PC, you require additional steps to log in, like another password, or security questions or maybe a code sent in a text message.
-
-
-
So how many of you DONT have an authenticator ??? If you dont there are a few reasons why...
1. You cant afford to go to Blizzcon
2. You cant afford a Smart Phone
3. You like getting hacked
and
4. Your parents already blew a bunch of money on all the other things you bitched about wanting but dont work for..
Everyone else that does have one.... congrats and enjoy :) -
-
-
Can anyone answer me, don't Blizzard have any "White Knight" hackers? Haven't they tried to reconstruct how hacking is done, so that the hole can be plugged? How exactly does it work when someone "steals" your login info and cleans your characters out? Can someone point me to an article or youtube video that explains the process?
I had already decided not to get Diablo 3 until patch 1.1 is out, containing PVP, now I feel like waiting until they've beefed up security and the effectiveness of that "authenticator".
-