EA focusing on 'hits,' releasing fewer games
EA plans to once again reduce the number of titles it releases over the coming year so it can focus on "hit" games.
Electronic Arts yesterday filed its annual 'Form 10-K' financial mega-report with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. As well as the usual sums of income and expenditure, the 119-page report offers a handful of little fact nuggets giving a wider view of what's going on at EA, including its future plans.
As we reported earlier this month, EA ended its 2011 fiscal year on March 31 with a loss of $267 million. This was a big improvement over the 2010 fiscal year, however, when the company lost $677 million. With things somewhat on the mend, what's EA's next step?
The developer and publisher reveals it plans to yet again cut the number of titles it releases. During the 2012 fiscal year, EA expects to only release "approximately" 22 "primary" titles. This is down from 36 in the last fiscal year, which itself was down from 54 in FY2010.
"In our industry, though many new products and services are regularly introduced, only a relatively small number of 'hit' titles accounts for a significant portion of total revenue for the industry," EA explained. "Publishing fewer titles means that we concentrate more of our development spending on each title, and driving 'hit' titles often requires large marketing budgets and media spend."
It's a double-edged sword, though, as EA notes that "The underperformance of a title may have a large adverse impact on our financial results. Also, hit products or services offered by our competitors may take a larger share of consumer spending."
EA also revealed which titles were the biggest across the world over the last fiscal year, saying North American revenue was "driven by" Madden NFL 11, Battlefield: Bad Company 2, and Medal of Honor. In Europe, however, FIFA Soccer 11, Medal of Honor and Need for Speed Hot Pursuit were in the driver's seat. Over in Asia, the top games were FIFA 11, Medal of Honor, and the free-to-play EA Sports FIFA Online 2.
Two last fun little fact nuggets for you--direct sales to GameStop accounted for 16% of EA's net revenue, while Walmart was 10%. That'll be why GameStop has so much bargaining power and gets so much special treatment.
-
Shacknews
replyAlice O'Connor posted a new article, EA focusing on 'hits,' releasing fewer games.
EA plans to once again reduce the number of titles it releases over the coming year so it can focus on "hit" games.-
so theyre dropping all of their Wii titles?
-
As everyone will after e3
-
-
Make less games. Milk the games you actually had success with. Fail later on and ponder why no one is buying the 10th sequel to "x".
-
[deleted]
-
-
-
...though in the context of music games, my favorite is http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2009/11/18/ .
"Maybe people just ran out of room for plastic crap." -
-
[deleted]
-
-
-
-
you can just buy new successful game studios. Though I suppose there may be no new studios to buy at some point if there are no longer independent studios that can get funding to make their own games. Hmm.
-
-
-
Also 'sith.' Also applies.
-
-
-
Anyone should have seen that coming.
-
-
-
Mass Effect 4: Who's cornhole will I plant it in this time.
-
Oh marketing, you so crazy. I mean, literally CRAZY. Like, not sane. Like, doesn't learn from previous experiences and repeats the actions that previously failed, without understanding. Like, believes in market forces that don't exist.
-
They're reacting about as quickly as they can. They started trusting gamers with awesome games like Mirror's Edge and Dead Space after the new management came in, then the 2009-2010 earnings were horrible and they haven't had time to switch back to things that actually made them money. It's tragic, but I blame everyone that didn't buy the brilliant and gorgeous games they've been putting out in response to gamer demand.
(The recent entries in the CNC franchise are not included on the 'brilliant games' list.)-
unfortunately true. It seemed like they were turning a corner but it didn't work for them. So who can blame them?
-
Apparently Dead Space did pretty well if it has some sequels. But of course instead of creating even more franchises, they're just going to milk the few that they have until people stop buying those. Game publishers are kind of dumb.
-
Dead Space 2 was more of a "in for a penny in for a pound" sort of deal. That game must have cost somewhere around 100m by the time they did all that advertising and bankrolled that shitty animated film. So when it took 3 months for it to reach 1.5 million copies sold, DS did not come out a big earner..
EA has had a few fuckups like this. The aforementioned mirrors edge and mire significantly the new moh and ranted inferno. All big plays that didn't convert.-
[deleted]
-
-
[deleted]
-
It's kind of disappointing that MoH sold that well. It looks so generic. I remember people being pretty "meh" about it too.
-
[deleted]
-
-
-
"EA has no GTA or CoD type franchise at this point"
um isn't the Battlefield franchise published by EA? Everybody knows that THAT franchise sure isn't going to generate sales...
nice try at looking like you know what you're talking about though-
-
Yup. You need to pay more attention, RumpleForeSkin. Battlefield is big but not CoD big. Still, it's the closest EA has to a sure thing other than Madden and apparently FIFA. I would be really worried about MoH2 sales. I don't think it will sell more than MoH1. I think it will do significantly less business.
-
-
-
[deleted]
-
-
-
-
Yeah, and their marketing campaign massively dropped the fucking ball on DS2 as well.
YOUR MOTHER WILL HATE THIS GAME.
Oh boy, evidently we're all 10 again.
-
-
-
Was mirror's edge really that great though?
-
-
No I mean I played the demo and I thought it was okay I guess but it didn't seem great to me and it didn't seem to get people around me who play games and spend a lot of money on games talking. I think some of my friends even bought it and I didn't hear a peep from them about it being great and something I should by or any anecdotes about it or anything.
It may have been an original IP but I don't know that it was a good enough game to warrant a sequel?-
I found it mainly frustrating and it had terrible flow. Run to edge, look for path, back up, attempt path, fall and die, repeat. I'm pretty sure your experience is the average experience. I know a lot of people gush over it, and yeah it was new and neat, but obviously it didn't do well for EA.
-
-
It was both amazing and terrible.
-
I loved it. Could have used fewer guns
-
-
-
[deleted]
-
^^This is the correct answer.
It was basically as fun as you wanted it to make it be.
The gunplay wasn't good enough to be left in, yet they did, but it also made the game ludicrously easy, and when you got to bits where guns weren't available it could get really tricky (see: fighting the police ninjas) as you had gotten so used to having firepower available to you.
-
-
-
Mirror's Edge was a good game. Not a great game, but a good game. But it was also a bit of a niche game that was never destined to be a Bestseller.
Dead Space was a borderline great game that should have done well, but the current market climate seems to favor faster-paced games, high action
-
-
Well. That came out harsher than even I expected*. I don't think marketing is crazy (I just don't get it because I'm ignorant) - and I'm just hating that there's no more 'middle class' of games, or that no one believes those games can be profitable anymore. Seems like everything is either 'omg blockbuster!' or 'cool indie weirdness' these days. If it falls between, it fails in the public consciousness. Games as 'srs bzns' will always scare and confuse me, I guess.
*I blame the fact that lately I constantly listen to stand up comedians and have started to unconsciously (and badly) ape the 'attitude' and I have to cram useless hyperbole into every statement, all the time (and not well).
-
What a game there last bunch of poorly made rushed bland games failed to sell well wounder why.
I guess we now get to see the raw power of ctrl c and ctrl v can do as they change the levels around and push out the same game again that sold a few units. -
Same strategy Activision's been using for many years, focusing on their "big proposition" games. Most pubs aren't really interested in games that sell less than 4-5m units these days and they need the 10m+ sellers to really float the company year after year.
-
-
[deleted]
-
Same. Indie games seem like the only ones trying anything different. Every big console game feels like it's a copy of a previous game with some minor tweaks.
-
[deleted]
-
They could do multiple tiers like movie studios though and they really don't. EA will release a couple of downloadable and phone games, but not as much as they should.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Sounds like they are doubling down. EA will also probably increase Project 10 Dollar to Project 20 Dollar. I am surprised to hear that Medal of Honor drove more revenue than Mass Effect over the last fiscal year; guess that would be the overseas MoH sales. Long term looks somewhat scary for EA because Madden, FIFA, and Battlefield are the only steady franchises I see.
Thanks for the note about GameStop's share of the pie. Important detail.-
No, as any investor who watched the last meeting while DLC is an important piece of strategy it will not be a perceived "mandatory" one as Online Pass type stuff. That project was successful but the long-term strategy is to understand customers better and to allow them to continue to purchase new content for their games and establish better relationships that can get them playing other EA games as well (cross-game promotions, etc).
-
-
http://idleballad.com/
This seems like an appropriate place for the ballad of John Riccitello-
I was thinking the same thing, and i am quite disappoint that Alice did not link it in the article.
-
-
[deleted]
-
-
I actually like that idea.
-
Well Chris Roberts is in the movie industry now so at least that sort of makes sense. Just bring him back and get Mark Hamill to do voice acting and I'm totally for that idea.
-
Good. They can start with a next gen Ultima for fuck's sake.
-
I can't see any way that a big budget reboot of Ultima would retain anything that made the original series unique.
-
[deleted]
-
they claimed they would do that with oblivion, but if they have I must have a played the wrong game. It has almost nothing of what made ultima 7 a great game except that it is a semi big world you can run around in, with swords.
-
-
Same could be said for Fallout, and others like GTA. It's all in the team and execution. Throw a talented team at Ultima and it could be done. Why let Oblivion, Fable, Witcher and others take the RPG crown from you?
-
That said...I've little doubt that in EA's current culture a talented team would try to do the right thing but could not due to internal EA political maneuvering or rush to market.
-
-
-
holy shit, I never would've seen you as a fan for Ultima. They has an Ultima X (a single player game) in the works at some point, I wonder if they revisit that project.
-
has = had *
* except for cat meme purposes -
There were supposed to be 12 single-player Ultimas in the end. :(
-
-
-
-
^^You guys should all open your own game publisher and show em how its done!
-
yeah same with hollywood. People should be grateful to see superhero movie part 13 rebooted the sequel instead of demanding "creativity" or "quality".
-
It's not like there's a long history of publishers running a small number of titles into the ground and ultimately going under.
-
EA will never "get it".
Stop releasing the same sports games every year with no changes other than a roster and new menues to make it appear new.
Stop buying development studios and then close them and lay off all the talented employees that made their games what they were. Eg. Westwood studios.
Stop treating your employees like low wage slaves and then give the executives outrageous salaries and bonuses for making these poor decisions in the first place.
And so on... there are so many...
-
