Dr DisRespect Interview: One Week Before Admitting to Adultery
We talk to Dr. Disrespect one week before he made the announcement that could change the direction of his career.
Dr. Disrespect has made waves among PUBG streamers and players for quite a while, now. This week, he made an announcement tantamount to a tsunami: He'd been unfaithful in his marriage, and would be taking time off to get his personal life in order and re-evaluate his professional goals. We caught up with Dr. Disrespect, who won Trending Gamer at this year's Game Awards, one week before the announcement to chat about his persona, his bulletproof mullet, and other topics.
For more videos, including gameplay and interviews, visit the Shacknews and GamerHub.tv YouTube channels.
-
Shacknews
replyShack Staff posted a new article, Dr DisRespect Interview: One Week Before Admitting to Adultery
-
[deleted]
-
[deleted]
-
[deleted]
-
[deleted]
-
-
-
-
that’s his wife there so.... definitely didn’t hook up at these awards....
-
[deleted]
-
[deleted]
-
[deleted]
-
-
I wonder which Twitch titty streamer he banged. That was sad to watch ... his poor little daughter
-
[deleted]
-
-
-
Which isn't anyone here...average age here is around 36-38
-
Front page is not for us. They need the clicks.
-
-
-
-
[deleted]
-
-
Watch out Shacknews, the chatty morality squad is in full effect.
-
-
-
You dont know how your moral judgement might be tested when within 1 year you go from average joe to over 1 million followers.
Dude became an internet superstar and had the adoration of thousands daily spamming him for attention. The guy is human, who knows how many fans threw themselves at him. People are human, they make mistakes. We have all had that instinctual urge to just fuck. Besides we dont know the details.
Everyone just wants to sit on their moral high horse from across the country and judge. He probably more women throwing ass per hour at him then you have your entire life. That shit does something to a guy. It fucks you up. You need to be very head strong to temptation.-
[deleted]
-
-
[deleted]
-
He's our resident MRA. But I do agree that this is between him and his wife.
-
-
-
[deleted]
-
-
[deleted]
-
-
-
-
also no, i don’t buy excuses for infidelity
we make choices and act on our own volition. some of us are indeed confident we would never betray our wives, husbands, partners, because we have bigger hearts than that and could never hurt them that way
can spare me the sob story about a video game streamer who just couldn’t resist some ass at a convention or whatever the fuck. dude had a choice and blew it.
the people i actually feel bad for? his wife and kids
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
[deleted]
-
[deleted]
-
[deleted]
-
-
[deleted]
-
-
-
[deleted]
-
-
The fuck is up with this headline? Lol, come on.
-
Who wrote this fucking headline? Embarrassing.
-
I think the votes are in, this headline blows.
-
Shack Staff? Did no one person want to assign their name to that clickbait?
-
-
Oh shit, well, if we're making that ethical compromise, when is the Asif sex tape?
-
[deleted]
-
-
-
-
[deleted]
-
-
-
-
[deleted]
-
-
[deleted]
-
-
[deleted]
-
-
-
[deleted]
-
[deleted]
-
[deleted]
-
mehhh I thought we were talking about people but I guess if you want to count riot and their tourneys that drive in 200k viewers thats fine I guess. but the doc IS the 2nd highest personality
when people talk about twitch streams they dont talk about LoL tourneys, but thats just my opinion-
[deleted]
-
I suppose but shroud and others on that list stream on the weekend...which the doc doesnt. and drdisrespect didnt stream yesterday obviously
by my calculation if he had shroud's live hours he'd be at 1.6m, back up to top 4 or 5-
[deleted]
-
fine ill let it go. he is not the biggest streamer plus summit and shroud probably have more staying power over time even without the adultery incident
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
[deleted]
-
[deleted]
-
[deleted]
-
[deleted]
-
-
[deleted]
-
"Shit on me all you want, I'm happy (and drunk!)"
Trl:dr: "i have no formal education or moral/ethical qualms about what I do and stumbled my way into success in a position that pays me for doing my part in making the world a shittier place but I'm going around throwing shade other peoples workplace on the issue of the editorial on the front page because I have no self-awareness or shame."
how did I do? I didn’t really want to but I figured since I gave virus shit for his post you are equally if not more deserving (even though I disagree with him on the issue).
-
oooof hahahaha
-
[deleted]
-
-
[deleted]
-
Oooof
-
-
-
-
The second I saw the GOOG callout I was hoping to God I saw the FNC riposte.
https://media.giphy.com/media/10jKKQKakfdMYM/giphy.gif -
[deleted]
-
[deleted]
-
[deleted]
-
-
-
Adulterers aren't fair game anymore?
-
-
[deleted]
-
[deleted]
-
-
Its amateur as hell, even for a site that struggles with content as it is.
How do you allow something like this to go up next to something as great as the stuff that David Craddock writes? It cheapens everything else on the site.
And, with the amount of time that most people have been around here, we have more than earned the right to call out bs like this.-
-
[deleted]
-
-
Pretty much this. Also: This idea that readers (OK, occasional readers, more often shitposters) of a website shouldn't comment on editorial decisions even if they just now discovered the site for only this one thing is strange
This is like when people go "but they also have this other great journalistic content that is only made possible by this" when anyone thinks a buzzfeed list is shitty and unnecessary - sure they're right, but then what do we get? A situation where no-one is supposed to criticize anything (subjectively ofc) "bad" anyone does, as long as the producers bank rolls something "better" based on the bad.
Good job everyone
-
-
I expect better posts than this from you.
-
[deleted]
-
-
[deleted]
-
-
If I've been coming to your house for years and feel comfortable enough that when you get a new couch, I'll tell you your couch sucks, especially if you've invited opinion/feedback in the past on other things. What you do with that information is entirely up to you, I would hope though, it would be weighed and considered.
-
*comfortable enough with you, is what I meant
You know what, pffft, fuck this. I ain't dying on the hill of Popular-Twitch-Guy-Stuck-His-Dick-In-Another-Consenual-Adult-While-Married. I just don't think putting that as a headline is beneficial or bring in the kind of users that will add to the community we want to create.
-
-
-
[deleted]
-
[deleted]
-
-
-
[deleted]
-
[deleted]
-
This is such a weird thing to take a stand on, man. It's a public forum, the topics range from what constitutes a rogue-like and what isn't to Milleh's Anal Adventures. What don't we discuss or have out in the open as a community (an aging one)? Critiquing on topical content is somehow taboo?
-
I mean, I came here in 1999 for Quake, but I stayed for this: http://www.shacknews.com/chatty?id=36541330#item_36541330
-
-
-
[deleted]
-
[deleted]
-
Regardless of what you may believe, no one needs to pay anything in order to offer their two cents on what they may or may not find offensive or detrimental to this site, in regards to content.
-
[deleted]
-
[deleted]
-
-
[deleted]
-
-
Actually, looking back, you get a little weird about negative opinions in general: http://www.shacknews.com/chatty?id=33417973#item_33417973w
WHY ARE YOU LIKE THIS?!-
[deleted]
-
it wasn't hard to find, i remembered that post because of how odd i thought it was back then and this argument we're having seemed familiar
but 'strange and creepy'-
and of all the posts i've made in this sub-thread, this is the one you responded to and in that fashion? low-hanging fruit, virus
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
[deleted]
-
No one's making you look at it. That's on you.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Everyone here has absolutely 100% unquestionable right to complain, dissent, question, or otherwise lambast anything and everything they want to. That’s the way an open forum like this works and is exactly why this chatty still continues on being a place we all choose to hang out at to this day.
Are you drunk?
-
-
You know what, I take it back. I take back my expectations for better posts from you. >;[
-
-
[deleted]
-
-
[deleted]
-
my bad, I had a few too many rum drinks and jumped straight to the easy shitpost
we should absolutely ask more of the shack when they post shit like this, and just saying "step aside, they're a WEBSITE" is crazy
they publish to the internet and we are free to comment. a lot of people think it's insensitive to lump a random 3rd party clip of an interview to his cheating. let's flip the picture and say this guy died? how would it reflect if the post was "interview with a man weeks before he died, you won't BELIEVE what he said!"?
-
-
-
drakoniac, bro
-
-
I'm not surprised that you of all people have not the capacity to understand what about a headline like this annoys folks but when even the fucking fox News guy goes "dunno guys maybe that's a bit sleazy" it should give you pause. Its also not the first time the shack has run with some subpar material and thankfully people here have always called it out in the same way they have encouraged quality articles. Owning a site doesn't give you some magical shield against criticism, only a complete and utterly delusional moron would think that it does. So how about you take a good look at the comments and try to figure our why people tend to frown upon this instead?
-
I have to agree with virus.
How many of you complaining have Mercury? Probably some. All?
How much ownership do you actually think you have over this small slice of a small Website? This community, this conversation board. It's tiny, it's not a factor in ANY business decisions.
You think you're the audience and sole arbiter of what is acceptable on the greater Website, but you're not. We're not. This is an anomaly, a holdover. A vestigial limb that has no modern function.
Chatty is great and there are a lot of great people in there but don't mistake your persistence in posting for free with some sort of stake in the Shacknews.com company. It isn't there and it won't be there.-
Is anyone seriously doing other than just giving their opinion, I mean is anyone demanding anything or acting like they're entitled to control the content, not just comment on it?
Why are you trying to discourage readers of the website (who, sure, are also shitposters on this supposedly worthless vestigial limb of a forum) from commenting on what they they think about content? How little regard does the site really have for user feedback? Have the times requesting reader/user feedback just been for show? -
[deleted]
-
That's just it, I don't think we're the user base.
Most of us don't even read front page content unless it's linked here.
We aren't the audience so why do we get to make the judgment call?-
[deleted]
-
"Judgement call"? If commenting on an article's angle or content, on an article which has comments enabled, be it from useless shitposters or occasional/first-time readers, is problematic (omg non-target audience judging things), then maybe explicitly have some guidelines banning that, or just not enable comments on the articles on which (apparently) no comments are desired
You're trying to make people who actually care enough to visist (even parts of) this site daily shut up about what they think about content the site posts. It's very, very strange. Have guidelines banning any perceived negative comments on editorial decisions/content, if it's such a problem
-
-
-
So people should just shut up and not say anything about trash content because we "owe" the site for keeping chatty going? lol
I'm complaining and have Mercury. If they want to drive traffic and revenue to the site for premium content with Mercury (like they've said they do) mixing in the premium content with clickhole trash isn't going to bring in anyone new.
Clickbait trash articles get called out on tons of "serious" sites - Arstechnica is the one that stands out in my mind. They have great content and when a clickbait shitty article gets posted their community calls them out on it and keeps them in check. -
really ED? you're making a stand on this?
How much ownership do you actually think you have over this small slice of a small Website?
As much as you.
It's tiny, it's not a factor in ANY business decisions.
No one is claiming otherwise.
You think you're the audience and sole arbiter of what is acceptable on the greater Website, but you're not. We're not. This is an anomaly, a holdover. A vestigial limb that has no modern function.
Ok, then get rid of it.
but don't mistake your persistence in posting for free with some sort of stake in the Shacknews.com company. It isn't there and it won't be there.
Is this a threat? -
Fuck that. This site can do better and does. I'll gladly pass along/praise awesome content like "Rocket Jump." I also have zero problems in calling out bullshit like this.
-
[deleted]
-
[deleted]
-
[deleted]
-
-
lol uh oh i expressed an opinion on an internet forum i guess i'm the sole arbiter of what is acceptable now
or maybe it's okay to have an opinion about what is posted on the site. frankly i'm surprised at how many people are defending this old game awards carpet interview being repurposed as a dig against a guy that publicly admitted wrongdoing. i don't always have to agree with the site content but this was a new low imho. i guess i should keep that to myself
-
-
[deleted]
-
[deleted]
-
-
I know who he is though I don't watch him or whatever but I hope he can manage to rescue his relationship. People can screw up and honestly it's up to him and his partner to see if could be repaired. Whining about the shack giving coverage to this is imo like that Simpson comic old man yells at cloud.
-
-
He's a big streamer that happened to announce publicly he screwed up, I don't have any problems with the shack giving it coverage since it's something that can comes straight from the source not some paparazzi TMZ thing the shack is pulling off. So I think you don't like it? then simply ignore it.
-
Did you read my post? Did you read the article?
This isn’t coverage by the shack. This is a sorry excuse to post a terrible interview from a couple of weeks ago under a clickbait title.
Again, this isn’t some exposition about one of the largest streamers stirring up controversy. It’s a trash news post and they should be ashamed.-
-
Like what? What other first world problems should have taken up my 10-15 minutes that I spend bitching about this in a good-natured fashion on a Friday evening while buzzed?
-
*spent
I should stop. >-< -
-
-
-
-
[deleted]
-
-
-
-
A bunch of articles popped up today in my google news feed.
This is gaming soap opera, people eat it up. Interesting times we live in with twitch and gaming celebrities with tabloid scandals. -
[deleted]
-
-
shes in the interview, shes the one hanging around. also in guy beahm's twitter (doc's real name)
-
-
[deleted]
-
On one hand, we expect quality content because it's our beloved shacknews
On the other hand, if you don't consume this content here, it will be consumed somewhere else. In fact there was already a thread about it, shackers did in fact discuss this.
On another hand, nobody visits the front page anyway and as such, why do ww care?
On a different hand, we're really getting old and salty cranky
how many hands
-
[deleted]
-
Wonder how many people complaining even know there's a front page or even check it.
-
I think this hurts an already hurting family. I don't think the title should stand.
-
-
[deleted]
-
-
-
-
honestly I find this pretty shitty guys, don't become one of those sites
-
-
-
-
[deleted]
-
-
[deleted]
-
[deleted]
-
-
-
-
-
[deleted]
-
[deleted]
-
-
[deleted]
-
[deleted]
-
-
-
-
-
[deleted]
-
-
[deleted]
-
[deleted]
-
Lol I tried to view this article.
http://chattypics.com/files/shackbrowseUpload_b9cmam2jgl.jpg
-
[deleted]
-
Yeah, I'm confused.
-
Shack gonna shack
-
[deleted]
-
[deleted]
-
-
This thread genuinely sucks. Some shit personal attacks as well. Wtf guys.
-
Fuck that guy, and thank you all for this thead lol
-
[deleted]
-
Posting in an epic thread.
-
