Battlefield 4 PC system requirements revealed
Battlefield 4 may be pretty, but it has surprisingly lax min-spec requirements for PC players. Looks like supporting both current and next-gen consoles resulted in an engine that can support a pretty wide range of PC tech.
Battlefield 4 may be pretty, but it has surprisingly lax min-spec requirements for PC players. Looks like supporting both current and next-gen consoles resulted in an engine that can support a pretty wide range of PC tech.
Oddly, DICE recommends Windows 8 for their game. Check out the full list after the break.
Minimum Requirements:
- OS: Windows Vista SP2 32-bit
- CPU: AMD Athlon X2 2.8GHz or Intel Core 2 Duo 2.4GHz
- RAM: 4GB
- GPU: AMD Radeon HD 3870 or Nvidia Geforce 8800GT with 512MB of memory
- HDD: 30GB
Recommended:
- OS: Windows 8 64-bit
- CPU: AMD six-core or Intel quad-core
- RAM: 8GB
- GPU: AMD Radeon HD 7870 or Nvidia Geforce GTX 660 with 3GB of memory
(via Polygon)
-
Andrew Yoon posted a new article, Battlefield 4 PC system requirements revealed.
Battlefield 4 may be pretty, but it has surprisingly lax min-spec requirements for PC players. Looks like supporting both current and next-gen consoles resulted in an engine that can support a pretty wide range of PC tech.-
Windows 8 requirement for the recommended specs is due to dx11.1 features that weren't added to win7
http://www.bf4blog.com/battlefield-4-on-windows-8-will-have-better-cpu-optimization/ -
-
It's not odd they recommend Windows 8. The latest games run the best on Microsoft Windows 8, and I know because I switch back and forth between it and Windows 7 x64 and test constantly.
Windows 8.1 is fantastic, and placing the current desktop background in the Modern UI actually works really well. Now all they need to do is make it so we can optionally run Windows 8 apps in Windowed mode and not fullscreen.-
look into modernmix... works (mostly) great for running metro apps in a window. well enough to be worth the 5 bucks, for sure....
http://www.stardock.com/modernmix/-
Link didn't work for me; here's the corrected one.
http://www.stardock.com/products/modernmix/
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Just by pure statistics, you've likely played against (and been outscored by) a dude playing BF3 with a controller.
There's no question that the mouse provides more points of input and thus is more accurate, but that doesn't mean that every person using a M+KB is utilizing their precision in the best way possible. An analog stick provides plenty precision with which to waste dudes. I feel like a factor often overlooked regarding console gamers VS. the PC crowd is actually framerate and IQ. People make way too much about the disparity in control interfaces. If you're good at a game, you're good at a game.
This is of course assuming normal circumstances, not like a tournament game or something where everyone is the best of the best. -
I feel I could hold my own in a random pub server with a gamepad. I'm not saying I'd be top but it's not THAT much of a disadvantage - if you play tactically most kills are because you get the jump on someone anyway and then assuming you don't have broken thumbs there's no reason you can't shoot em dead quick enough to negate the advantage of a mouse.
-
I actually played a good few rounds of Crysis 3 with an Xbox controller when it came out just because I'd had it set up that way for single player. I won or came close to the top of every single match. I wouldn't recommend it for top level competitive play, but if you're decent with a pad I'd say you can do just fine.
-
-
-
-
-
-