Evening Reading: Steam Rising

Over the past few days Steam really pulled out all the stops for its holiday sale (as Chris can attest from updating the PSA story). Many of the deals -- Prey for $2.99 (which sold out!), Torchlight marked down first to $10 and then $5, deep discounts on packs, and so much more -- offered outrageously low prices. Judging by the responses around the Net the sale proved irresistible on an unprecedented scale. Along with those taking advantage of the individual offers, I saw countless instances of people recounting sizeable lists of their purchases.

With all the talk about the coming era of digital video game distribution we could well look back at this as a pivotal moment and master stroke by Steam. Nothing overcomes reluctance to try a new thing like a great deal. Valve keeps its figures closely guarded but it's no secret that Steam has built a strong base. They've also refined the service to a point that buying and playing a game through Steam is a smooth process. That strength gave them a strong position from which to use a sale like this to catapult the service to new heights. How many people took the plunge and bought their first game from Steam in the past week? And don't think it's PC-exclusive. While it's gone along relatively unnoticed, Microsoft's Xbox Live Games on Demand service now boasts 88 titles. It's not out of the question that we'd see the first day-and-date new release hit there in 2010.

Being the holiday week we don't have nearly that many stories but you'll still want to check out:

The Chinese can now boast the world's fastest high-speed train.

Take note aspiring writers of these ten words you need to stop misspelling

And if you haven't followed the Billboard charts here's this year's top 25 hits in one glorious mashup by DJ Earworm

From The Chatty
  • reply
    December 29, 2009 5:09 PM

    [deleted]

    • reply
      December 29, 2009 5:12 PM

      i read the ER and it says that nowhere. maybe im blind

    • reply
      December 29, 2009 5:15 PM

      Without the twist, it's a pretty by-the-numbers crime movie and unremarkable. As a movie, it's a great one time watch but there's really not much substance to it.

    • reply
      December 29, 2009 5:16 PM

      [deleted]

    • reply
      December 29, 2009 5:20 PM

      Seriously. SERIOUSLY.

    • reply
      December 29, 2009 5:27 PM

      I was very underwhelmed by it, but I've only seen it once years ago. I could see liking it more when I rewatch it, but the reliance on the final minute is kinda lame. A movie shouldn't be good because of a twist at the end.

    • reply
      December 29, 2009 5:35 PM

      It wasn't bad, it just didn't have a lot of substance beyond the twist and Spacey's performance.

      • reply
        December 29, 2009 5:40 PM

        [deleted]

        • reply
          December 29, 2009 5:45 PM

          Agreed. Every character played their role fantastically.

          However, I can't imagine watching that movie a second time. After its first viewing, you're pretty much done with it. There's no extra details to pick up – if Spacey had been more nuanced in his role, with small details and hints, that would be different – so on that level, I think it's merely an okay movie. Movies with no replayability, like video games, are kind of a letdown.

          • reply
            December 29, 2009 6:08 PM

            Well said.

            I rewatched Usual Suspects recently -first rewatch ever. I was struck by how bare-bones and (honestly) boring the heist story itself is.

    • reply
      December 29, 2009 5:37 PM

      [deleted]

    • reply
      December 29, 2009 6:11 PM

      [deleted]

      • reply
        December 29, 2009 6:27 PM

        Hit yourself in the face with a hammer.

    • reply
      December 29, 2009 6:27 PM

      Seriously good movie.

    • reply
      December 29, 2009 7:39 PM

      It'll flip ya. Flip ya fa reel.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLcWMGCLHa0#t=2m22s

      • reply
        December 29, 2009 7:46 PM

        i wouldnt suggest clicking this link if you havent seen the movie, some spoilers on the right

    • reply
      December 29, 2009 7:55 PM

      "One...Two, Three...Four Five. Oswald was a pansy."

Hello, Meet Lola