Microsoft: Rare, Lionhead Safe After Closures
Speaking to GamesIndustry, Spencer remarked that "the work that those studios are doing [is] incredibly important to [Microsoft]." He offered additional praise for Rare, perhaps in response to recent criticism of the studio. "What studio on the planet signs up for two launch games? That's just crazy," he commented.
As for Lionhead, its Xbox 360 exclusive Fable 2 just went gold, potentially leaving the studio's future in the air. "The next Lionhead game is definitely [a Microsoft Game Studios] game," Spencer promised.
-
A studio that consistently made consistently highly-rated, very high-selling games on a platform Microsoft weakly professes to support was shut down, while another that has yet to justify its industry record-breaking purchase price is assured its golden ticket is intact. Sounds good to me!
-
-
-
-
-
If that is the case then I think an argument can be made for both.
At the time when all of the games that ES put out were released they did push the envelope of the platform. They looked wonderful. They ran well on most all hardware. Things pretty much just worked.
The ES games also did a lot better job with historical context than just about every other game out there while remaining approachable by a wide variety of people. Many parents that were scared of games would not be afraid to let their kids play the Age of Empires series because they felt it did a very good job entertaining their kids while also providing some educational qualities. Not many RTS's (any other type of game either) can claim that. Total War does a better job with historical accuracy, but there is no way the audience is as broad for that as is the audience for Age of Empires. I know that there are others, but I think you would be hard pressed to find many other games that would hold the interests of a teen and that 'teach' as much as the AoE games do.
On top of those things, the games sold very well.
-
-