Blizzard Says World of Warcraft Bot Creator Earned $2.8 Million

69
Blizzard is now claiming that World of Warcraft bot author Michael Donnelly has made $2.8 million by selling his controversial Glider software, according to recent motions filed in court and mirrored on GamePolitics.

Donnelly, the author of popular World of Warcraft bot Glider--a downloadable tool that automatically plays the massively multiplayer game for users--was sued by Blizzard in February of 2007.

Both sides have since been locked in a legal battle, with Blizzard claiming that Donnelly knowingly infringed on its copyright, in addition to breaking World of Warcraft's End User License Agreement.

"Blizzard's designs expectations are frustrated, and resources are allocated unevenly, when bots are introduced into the WoW universe, because bots spend far more time in-game than an ordinary player would and consume resources the entire time," said Blizzard in a legal statement filed last week.

Donnelly claims that his program does not violate Blizzard's copyright because it never makes a true copy of the game client.

"Blizzard permits its licensees to load the WoW game client software into RAM to play WoW. As such, Blizzard's licensees cannot violate Blizzard's exclusive rights under the Copyright Act to make copies simply by loading a copy of the program into RAM to play WoW," reads one section of Donnelly's retort.

The MMO Glider program sells for $25, with an optional $5 subscription available that provides additional functionality.

"We are fans of the game that want to try out a lot of different things," reads a section of the MMO Glider website.

"Getting a bunch of characters to 70 is a pain. Getting money to equip them is a pain. Doing big instances, Battlegrounds, raids, and generally socializing in the game is fun. We use the Glider to skip the painful parts and have more fun. Someone suggested we sell it, so.."

From The Chatty
  • reply
    March 26, 2008 8:15 PM

    When I first heard about this I was thinking "damn, dude is going up against the full wrath of Blizzard Legal" but if he's made 2 million off of his bot, then he's got enough money to see this to the end.

    • reply
      March 26, 2008 8:32 PM

      Hopefully. As lame as the use of a bot is, this is not copyright infringement. Breaking the EULA is hardly sue-worthy. I realize that this pisses Blizzard off, and makes it "unfair", but that does not warrant this lawsuit.

      • reply
        March 26, 2008 8:41 PM

        Agreed. They should just do like SoE did and hire all the hack programmers to come work on their game's "security".

      • reply
        March 26, 2008 8:42 PM

        yea, breaking the EULA is grounds for account removal not lawsuit worthy. They're just pissed.

        • reply
          March 26, 2008 8:43 PM

          "bots spend more time in-game" , don't accounts get unlimited play time? Shouldn't be an issue.

          • reply
            March 26, 2008 9:33 PM

            Just because you have access to unlimited play time doesn't mean you spend all your time in the game doing stuff. Real people can't farm for XP and loot 24/7. Bots can. Hence "bots spend more time in game".

            • reply
              March 26, 2008 9:43 PM

              This works off the same principle as all you can eat buffets or soda refills. The restaurant knows you aren't going to stay for 8 hours eating the whole time.

              • reply
                March 26, 2008 9:51 PM

                yeah but you can't make a robot to eat food during buffet hours when you're not there (yet)

                its a game, not real life - pay your $15/mo and if you want to cheat to skip all the boring shit then go for it - just be aware Blizzard can ban you for doing so

              • reply
                March 26, 2008 9:51 PM

                yeah but you can't make a robot to eat food during buffet hours when you're not there (yet)

                its a game, not real life - pay your $15/mo and if you want to cheat to skip all the boring shit then go for it - just be aware Blizzard can ban you for doing so

                • reply
                  March 26, 2008 10:05 PM

                  That was my point. I was agreeing with Arcanum by presenting the real world equivalent.

            • reply
              March 26, 2008 11:08 PM

              but still, if they offer unlimited play time then they should allot every paying user 24 hour a day playing time and expect it.

        • reply
          March 30, 2008 4:30 AM

          Breaking the Terms of Service is grounds for account removal. Breaking the End Use Liscense Agreement is indeed grounds for lawsuit. When you purchase any softare, you're not buying THE PROGRAM, but the LISCENSE to use it, and the EULA tells you exactly what you are permitted to do with their softare.

      • reply
        March 26, 2008 8:59 PM

        The problem is they probably want to do everything in their power to crush this guy so other people don't follow - lest they have to spend increasing amounts of time chasing THEM down and potentially tweaking game balance around them - which hurts the player base.

        (Example: Fishing - just after launch, fishing got heavily nerfed because it was basically 'too good' and farmers could use it to just get a lot of items, sell them, and make money that way)

        • reply
          March 26, 2008 9:07 PM

          Fishing was actually worthwhile, without bots, in the beta. These days its pretty much worthless. =/

          • reply
            March 27, 2008 6:29 AM

            Right and the reason it isn't worth while is because of the huge amount of bots that creeped up so people were getting stuff like mad.

      • reply
        March 26, 2008 9:28 PM

        It's not just EULA violations. The copyright claim comes from the particular way MMO Glider works. It runs WoW is a sort of virtual machine; the copy of the game that's running in the VM is unauthorized, according to Blizzard. That doesn't seem like a particularly strong copyright claim, true, but it's not completely meritless either.

        There are also claims of deliberate interference with the contracts between Blizzard and other players, and some other stuff I don't remember.

        • reply
          March 27, 2008 4:13 AM

          "the copy of the game that's running in the VM is unauthorized" This is exactly what he takes an issue with:

          "Blizzard permits its licensees to load the WoW game client software into RAM to play WoW. As such, Blizzard‘s licensees cannot violate Blizzard‘s exclusive rights under the Copyright Act to make copies simply by loading a copy of the program into RAM to play WoW"

      • reply
        March 26, 2008 9:35 PM

        Sure it does. He's breaking the game. And legally, copyright infringement can be based upon someone making money from the copyrighted work of someone else. It is highly likely that Blizzard will win the case.

        • reply
          March 26, 2008 10:17 PM

          Agreed. Can't wait to see this fucker lose his cash. What a douchebag.

          • reply
            March 27, 2008 3:31 AM

            Yeah, I hope he loses. All the bots in WoW surely make the game worse.

      • reply
        March 26, 2008 10:08 PM

        Making money off of a means of breaking the EULA is sue worthy. Fuck this guy.

    • reply
      March 26, 2008 8:33 PM

      [deleted]

      • reply
        March 26, 2008 9:41 PM

        What about chinese farmers using bots! That's like 10x10x10!

    • reply
      March 26, 2008 11:13 PM

      Just means at the end of this whole thing he will be back where he started... BROKE!

      • reply
        March 28, 2008 4:15 AM

        hopefully, because he deserves it

Hello, Meet Lola