The ESA, the ESRB, and the PSV

23
Trade publication Next Generation has posted a claim that the ESRB is to blame when it comes to poor ratings in games. A board independent, not industry-dependent, should launch a revision of ratings decisions; they say the ESRB has brought us shame. Well, that's what they say; what they've shown us today is a new ratings system technique. It rates violence, sex, language each on their own scale, presenting each one as unique. There are three traffic lights, one for each category, and red, yellow or green tells the degree. Parents check out these lights, determine how much is all right for their game-playing child to see. Seems a bit complicated, just a tad overrated? Pun surely intended, but the article's recommended to see a new side of the situation. With recent events, might be good to prevent further criticism to an industry organization.

Uh, sorry about that. In somewhat related news, the Entertainment Software Association joined with the Video Software Dealers Association to, as promised, file a lawsuit attempting to overturn California's recently passed legislation forbidding sale of violent video games to minors. The lawsuit is focusing on perceived violations of First Amendment rights as its primary argument. In response, the bill's author Leland Yee has launched sharp criticism yesterday against the industry, apparently claiming that the industry as a whole "is not concerned with the health and welfare of our children; they are simply concerned with their own financial interests." California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, who recently approved the bill, strongly supports the video game industry but has stated certain games should not fall into "the wrong hands" or the hands of children.

Note: the first paragraph of this news item should be read as a poem.

Filed Under
From The Chatty
  • reply
    October 21, 2005 10:51 AM

    Its the parents morans.

    • reply
      October 21, 2005 12:11 PM

      I hate morans! their just so moranic!....

Hello, Meet Lola