Illegal Game Law Costs California $282K

15
In the wake of Califonia's recent budget woes, the state today joined the ranks of Minnesota, Illinois and Louisana as it reimbursed the ESA $282,794 for legal fees relating to last year's overturning of an unconstitutional video game sales law.

"California deserves more from its legislators than pursuing flawed legislation," said ESA CEO Mike Gallagher (pictured left). "Rather than tackling real problems affecting Californians, they chose to waste time, money and state resources. It is shameful that legislators pursued personal agendas in spite of the facts."

According to the ESA, California is currently facing a $15 billion budget gap, with 100,000 state employees recently laid off, Governor Schwarzenegger seeking to cut wages for another 200,000, and the state reducing its Medicaid support by 10%.

The loosely-worded law would have created a new state-mandated rating label for games, with retailers fined if minors obtained a title that contained "serious injury to human beings in a manner that is especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel."

"The definition could literally apply to some classic literature if put in the form of a video game," remarked Judge Ronald Whyte, who ruled the legislation as unconstitutional.

California is currently seeking to appeal Whyte's decision, causing Gallagher to remark, "It is unfortunate that the state is stubbornly pursuing an appeal that is likely to lead to even more court-awarded fees."

Chris Faylor was previously a games journalist creating content at Shacknews.

Filed Under
From The Chatty
  • reply
    August 5, 2008 12:44 PM

    [deleted]

    • reply
      August 5, 2008 12:48 PM

      [deleted]

      • reply
        August 5, 2008 12:58 PM

        What is this phenomenon called, "Parenting" which you speak of?

      • reply
        August 5, 2008 1:28 PM

        Apparently not all game titles have ratings. An merit to this law's intent was that it was trying to increase the availability of game ratings so that parents could actually get a snapshot gage of game content when deciding whether or not their kids should be able to access it.

        But, I thought ESRB already did a great job with this. I can't find titles without the ratings. It would be interesting to see what percent of commercially available game titles do not have ESRB or other ratings.

        I'm opposed to restrictions on free speech, but I'm in favor of increasing the availability of information that the parent has for determining the suitability of a game for their kids. I don't care if other parents use or ignore the ratings—not my problem or my business. But I personally do care about game ratings when deciding what is appropriate for my own needs.

        • reply
          August 6, 2008 6:27 AM

          Most retailers won't even carry games without ratings, so that's why you haven't been able to find them.

    • reply
      August 5, 2008 1:39 PM

      Maybe they should all be regulated.

Hello, Meet Lola