Minnesota Pays ESA $91K for Illegal Game Law
The ESA, which is dedicated to the business and public affairs needs of game developers and publishers, also noted that it has now been awarded close to $2 million in fees and expenses spent battling unconstitutional game law in nine other districts.
"Minnesota's citizens should be outraged at paying the bill for this flawed plan. Minnesota's public officials ignored legal precedent and instead pursued a political agenda that ultimately cost taxpayers money," said ESA CEO Michael Gallagher.
Signed into law in June of 2006, the law sought to penalize minors for the rental or purchase of games rated M for Mature and above. An injunction to halt the law prior to implementation was issued two months later by Judge James M. Rosenbaum of the US District Court of Minnesota.
"Several other states have tried to regulate minors' access to video games. Every effort has been stricken for violating the First Amendment... The Court will not speculate as the motives of those who launched Minnesota's nearly doomed effort to 'protect' our children," Judge Rosenbaum said in a statement.
The ESA was reimbursed $91,000 after successfully challenging a similar law in the state of Louisiana, which was also deemed unconstitutional.
Last week, an overwhelming majority in the New York State Senate passed a bill proposing an advisory council for videogames. Introduced by Sen. Andrew Lanza (R) of Staten Island, the aim of the bill is to bring government oversight to game ratings beyond the service provided by the Entertainment Software Ratings Board.
The ESA's CEO added that "politicians need to realize that the key to protecting our children from inappropriate media content is not haphazard legislation, but rather parental education."
-
[deleted]
-
-
-
-
"Both" referring to...? I have no idea what the US constitution is like. All I know is that I seem to hear the word unconstitutional a lot.
I assume one of them is to punish minor, which is what I'm saying. But are you saying that it's unconstitutional to punish the ones doing the selling? That seems dumb... I'm talking jail time, just more along the lines of firing them. The same deal if you sell alcohol or cigarettes to minor because you fail at asking for ID (I'm not talking about shady stuff), y'know?-
Both laws that punish minors for buying and punishing vendors for selling violate the US Constitution's First Amendment:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."-
So by such logic a minor should be able to walk into a video store/sex shop and buy a bunch of porn? Why do all adult sites have that "YOU MUST BE OVER 18 TO VIEW THIS MATERIAL" warning, then? I thought there was some kind of law there.
Surely I'm not comparing video games to porn, that's ridiculous, but using the same "freedom of speech" logic, I don't see how watching people get gibbed by rocket launchers is very different from watching people get porked by sperm launchers.-
-
-
Films outside of pornography aren't regulated by the government, and there are quite a lot of films that never get shown in the big franchise movie theaters nor rated by the MPAA. Nudity and sex are more common in independent films than in mainstream cinema. (Incidentally, a number of porn-related "omg protect teh childrens" regulations have been struck down as unconstitutional as well.)
That's not the point, though. "Offensiveness" alone is not sufficient for a single work within a medium to be regulated, much less being enough to regulate the entire medium.-
Yeah, I get it. I just don't agree with it :)
I just look at myself -- I was exposed to all kinds of "bad media' as a young kid: R-rated movies, violent video games, eventually porn... and I turned out better than fine. I'm actually pretty successful for a guy my age.
It's all about the parents. I had (have) great parents who loved me and taught me the different between real/fiction, good/bad, and acceptable/unacceptable. They taught me how to take care of myself at a young age and allowed me to explore my independence, while always keeping a watchful eye. Maybe I'm "special," who knows, but I believe that good parenting is more important than any kind natural goodness. Every "bad" person I know -- addicts/alcoholics, criminals, etc. -- all suffered from bad parenting, while every good person I know has great parents.
I need one of hakshak's shirts.
-
-
By the way, here's a very brief description of what it takes to create a law abridging free speech that passes Constitutional muster:
http://www.shacknews.com/laryn.x?id=14139077#itemanchor_14139077
-
-
-
-
-
-
-